Kathryn Wiens1, Asmita Bhattarai2,3, Ashley Dores2,3, Pardis Pedram2,4, Jeanne V A Williams2, Andrew G M Bulloch2,3,4, Scott B Patten2,3,4. 1. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent reports express concerns about a mental health crisis among postsecondary students. These assertions, however, often arise from surveys conducted in postsecondary settings that lack the broader context of a referent group. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the mental health status of postsecondary students 18 to 25 years old from 2011 to 2017 and (2) to compare the mental health status of postsecondary students to nonstudents. METHODS: Prevalence was estimated for a set of mental health outcomes using seven annual iterations of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2011 to 2017). Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratio estimates comparing mental health status among postsecondary students and nonstudents, adjusting for age and sex. Random effects metaregression and meta-analyses techniques were used to evaluate trends in prevalence and odds ratio estimates over time. RESULTS: Over the study period, the prevalence of perceived low mental health, diagnosed mood and anxiety disorders, and past-year mental health consultations increased among female students, whereas binge drinking decreased among male students. With the exception of perceived stress, the odds of experiencing each mental health outcome were lower among postsecondary students compared to nonstudents. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the idea that postsecondary students have worse mental health than nonstudents of similar age. The perception of a crisis may arise from greater help-seeking behavior, diminishing stigma, or increasing mental health literacy. Regardless, the observance of these trends provide an opportunity to address a previously latent issue.
OBJECTIVE: Recent reports express concerns about a mental health crisis among postsecondary students. These assertions, however, often arise from surveys conducted in postsecondary settings that lack the broader context of a referent group. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the mental health status of postsecondary students 18 to 25 years old from 2011 to 2017 and (2) to compare the mental health status of postsecondary students to nonstudents. METHODS: Prevalence was estimated for a set of mental health outcomes using seven annual iterations of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2011 to 2017). Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratio estimates comparing mental health status among postsecondary students and nonstudents, adjusting for age and sex. Random effects metaregression and meta-analyses techniques were used to evaluate trends in prevalence and odds ratio estimates over time. RESULTS: Over the study period, the prevalence of perceived low mental health, diagnosed mood and anxiety disorders, and past-year mental health consultations increased among female students, whereas binge drinking decreased among male students. With the exception of perceived stress, the odds of experiencing each mental health outcome were lower among postsecondary students compared to nonstudents. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the idea that postsecondary students have worse mental health than nonstudents of similar age. The perception of a crisis may arise from greater help-seeking behavior, diminishing stigma, or increasing mental health literacy. Regardless, the observance of these trends provide an opportunity to address a previously latent issue.
Entities:
Keywords:
Canadian Community Health Survey; mental health; postsecondary; students; trends
Authors: Sue M Cotton; Annemarie Wright; Meredith G Harris; Anthony F Jorm; Patrick D McGorry Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: R P Auerbach; J Alonso; W G Axinn; P Cuijpers; D D Ebert; J G Green; I Hwang; R C Kessler; H Liu; P Mortier; M K Nock; S Pinder-Amaker; N A Sampson; S Aguilar-Gaxiola; A Al-Hamzawi; L H Andrade; C Benjet; J M Caldas-de-Almeida; K Demyttenaere; S Florescu; G de Girolamo; O Gureje; J M Haro; E G Karam; A Kiejna; V Kovess-Masfety; S Lee; J J McGrath; S O'Neill; B-E Pennell; K Scott; M Ten Have; Y Torres; A M Zaslavsky; Z Zarkov; R Bruffaerts Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: G Schomerus; C Schwahn; A Holzinger; P W Corrigan; H J Grabe; M G Carta; M C Angermeyer Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Konrad T Lisnyj; David L Pearl; Jennifer E McWhirter; Andrew Papadopoulos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: N King; B Linden; S Cunningham; D Rivera; J Rose; N Wagner; J Mulder; M Adams; R Baxter; A Duffy Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 4.144