| Literature DB >> 31939325 |
Yuanqing Huang1, Haolan Zhou1, Longfei Wu2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; coronary occlusion; dextrocardia; electrocardiogram; left circumflex artery; situs inversus
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31939325 PMCID: PMC7254168 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519893180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.Electrocardiogram manifestation on admission with (a) conventional lead placement and (b) modified lead placement prior to percutaneous coronary intervention, (c) right posterior lead placement (V1–V3 reflect V7–V9 as shown in this picture), and (d, e, f) modified lead placement on 3 consecutive days after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2.(a) Diagnostic angiogram with a 6-French Judkins right 4 catheter in the left anterior oblique 30° view revealing the cardiac silhouette in the right hemithorax, with the cardiac apex pointing rightward, and a diffusely diseased right coronary artery with non-significant stenosis. (b) Diagnostic angiogram with a 6-French Judkins left 3.5 catheter in the right anterior oblique 40° view showing total cutoff of the proximal left circumflex artery (white arrow). (c) Left circumflex artery in the right anterior oblique 40°, caudal 30° view following stenting showing TIMI 3 flow (black arrow).