| Literature DB >> 31939076 |
Takanori Fukuta1, Noriko Nishimura2, Yuko Shirouchi2, Norihito Inoue2, Hideki Uryu2, Yoshiharu Kusano2, Yuko Mishima2, Masahiro Yokoyama2, Naoko Tsuyama3, Kengo Takeuchi3,4, Yasuhito Terui2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of scheduled imaging for patients who achieved first complete remission after CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab. In this retrospective cohort study, we included 759 patients newly diagnosed with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at the Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. Relapsed patients were divided into two groups based on method of diagnosis: clinical symptoms (symptom group, n = 57) or scheduled imaging (imaging group, n = 27). Our primary goal was to compare overall survival and relapse-free survival between the two groups. No significant difference in outcomes was found between the symptom and imaging groups. Median overall survival [7.5 years; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0-9.7 vs. 9.1 years; 95% CI 2.7 to not reached; P = 0.747), and median relapse-free survival (1.8 years; 95% CI 1.4-2.5 vs. 2.4 years; 95% CI 1.2-4.4; P = 0.108). Surveillance imaging in patients with DLBCL who achieved first complete remission did not demonstrate an advantage in terms of overall survival or relapse-free survival.Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Surveillance imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 31939076 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-02819-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.490