| Literature DB >> 31938500 |
Guoqi Li1,2, Panpan Zhao1,2, Wenshan Shao1,3, Changqing Jin1,2, Lixiao Song1,2, Yanyun Chen1,2.
Abstract
Plants generally adopt different reproductive strategies to adapt to their environments and increase their fitness. Here, we studied the effects of enclosure cultivation on the reproductive allocation of a wheatgrass species Agropyron mongolicum in the Desert steppes of Northern China. The results showed that: (a) after enclosure cultivation, the height, clump width, coverage, and clump biomass of A. mongolicum significantly increased by 78.96% (p = .040), 63.50% (p = .013), 50.89% (p = .032), and 205.38% (p = .022), respectively, whereas density did not show a significant change (p = .330). (b) Enclosure cultivation significantly affected the biomass of A. mongolicum. Compared with cultivation outside the fence, root, leaf, and spike biomass of A. mongolicum inside the fence significantly increased by 183.52% (p = .020), 334.09% (p = .011), and 381.25% (p = .005), respectively. In addition, root biomass was the highest among the components (38.53 and 13.59 g inside and outside the fence, respectively) and spike biomass was the lowest (6.16 and 1.28 g inside and outside the fence, respectively). (c) Enclosure cultivation affected elemental nutrient allocation and the caloric values of various components of A. mongolicum, and the caloric values are positively correlated with carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents. Enclosure cultivation significantly reduced carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the roots, as well as nitrogen and phosphorus in the spikes, but significantly increased nitrogen in the spikes by 9.78%. The caloric values of A. mongolicum inside and outside the fence in decreasing order were as follows: spikes > leaves > stems > roots. Comparison of cultivation effects between inside and outside the fence showed that the caloric values of the spikes and roots significantly increased by 0.92% and 1.60%, respectively, whereas those of the leaves significantly decreased by 0.70%. Our results demonstrate that the reproductive allocation of elemental nutrients and caloric values in nonreproductive and reproductive organs are plastic to arid environments.Entities:
Keywords: Agropyron mongolicum; desert steppes; enclosure; reproductive allocation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31938500 PMCID: PMC6953548 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1A partial overview of field experimental plots and a photo of Agropyron mongolicum
Figure 2The locations of the sampling sites (a: China, b: Ningxia, c: Yanchi, d: Sampling sites)
Population characteristics of Agropyron mongolicum inside and outside the fence
| Item | Inside the fence | Outside the fence |
|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) | 57.57 ± 3.86 | 32.17 ± 1.51 |
| Clump width (cm) | 77.17 ± 6.35 | 47.20 ± 2.88 |
| Coverage (%) | 59.63 ± 2.35 | 39.52 ± 1.36 |
| Density (clump/m2) | 7.73 ± 2.44 | 6.80 ± 0.81 |
| Total biomass (g/clump) | 88.04 ± 7.71 | 28.83 ± 1.57 |
Significant correlation at the <0.05 level.
Significant correlation at the <0.01 level.
Figure 3Module biomass of Agropyron mongolicum population inside and outside the fence (Mean ± SE). Different capital letters indicate the significant difference between two sample plots (p < .05, n = 30)
Figure 4Nutrient allocation for each component of Agropyron mongolicum inside and outside the fence
Energy (caloric value) for each component of Agropyron mongolicum inside and outside the fence
| Plant components | Caloric value Q/(kJ/g) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inside the fence | Outside the fence | ||
| Roots | 17.13 ± 0.02 | 16.86 ± 0.08 | .042 |
| Stems | 17.17 ± 0.09 | 17.32 ± 0.07 | .126 |
| Leaves | 18.52 ± 0.02 | 18.65 ± 0.01 | .029 |
| Spikes | 19.82 ± 0.01 | 19.64 ± 0.03 | .010 |
Pearson's correlation coefficients for each component of Agropyron mongolicum biomass, caloric value, and nutrient elements content
| Item | Biomass | Caloric value | Total C | Total N | Total P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass | 1 | ||||
| Caloric value | −0.631 | 1 | |||
| Total C | −0.689 | 0.611 | 1 | ||
| Total N | −0.804 | 0.869 | 0.716 | 1 | |
| Total P | −0.722 | 0.947 | 0.663 | 0.953 | 1 |
Significant correlation at the <0.05 level.
Significant correlation at the <0.01 level.