| Literature DB >> 31938491 |
Letícia F Ramos1,2, Ricardo R C Solar3, Henrique T Santos2, Marcilio Fagundes2.
Abstract
Environmental factors act as drivers of species coexistence or competition. Mesic environments favor the action of parasites and predators on gall communities, while the factors that determine the structure of gall communities in xeric environments remain unknown. We evaluated the structure of gall communities along an environmental gradient defined by intrinsic plant characteristics, soil fertility, and aridity, and investigated the role of competition as a structuring force of gall communities in xeric environments. We created null models to compare observed and simulated patterns of co-occurrence of galls and used the C-score index to assess community aggregation or segregation. We used the NES C-score (standardized C-score) to compare patterns of co-occurrence with parameters of environmental quality. Xeric environments had poorer and more arid soils and more sclerophyllous plants than mesic environments, which was reflected in the distribution patterns of gall communities. Values of the C-score index revealed a segregated distribution of gall morphospecies in xeric environments, but a random distribution in mesic environments. The low availability of resources for oviposition and the high density of gallers in xeric environments reinforce interspecific competition as an important structuring force for gall communities in these environments.Entities:
Keywords: Copaiffera langsdorffii; bottom‐up; community assembly; environmental stress; null models; top‐down
Year: 2019 PMID: 31938491 PMCID: PMC6953684 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Map of the seven sites/populations in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Historical climatic characterization of the environmental variables of the study sites. Mean maximum temperature (°C) (T.max.), mean minimum temperature (°C) (T.min) and Piche evaporation (mm) (Evapo). Data for previous 55 years, obtained from INMET website, August 2015. The data obtained from meteorological stations closest to the study sites
| Habitat | Coordinates | Elevation | Insolation | T‐max | T‐mim | Evapo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rupestrian grasslands | 20°04′S, 43°59′W | 1,423 | 185.21 | 28.12 | 14.65 | 89.43 |
| Ironstone outcrops | 19°16′S, 43°35′W | 1,200 | 168.73 | 28.05 | 15.39 | 87.71 |
| Cerrado sensu | 16o40′S, 43o48′W | 652 | 222.86 | 29.73 | 17.54 | 138.52 |
| Arboreal cerrado | 19°20′S 44°24′W | 732 | 221.39 | 28.51 | 15.89 | 88.66 |
| Dry forest | 15º58′S, 44º16′W | 826 | 240.36 | 31.44 | 18.39 | 143.51 |
| Atlantic forest | 19°53'S 43°58'W | 915 | 208.05 | 27.13 | 17.26 | 116.92 |
| Riparian forest | 56°25′S, 80°96′W | 480 | 229.28 | 31.03 | 18.30 | 125.62 |
Figure 2Principal component analysis (PCA) of soil quality indicator parameters of the seven study sites
Figure 3(a) Variation in specific leaf mass of plants of Copaifera langsdorffii among the seven study sites/environments with different levels of stress. Same letters on bars represent grouping by contrast analysis. (b) Variation of specific leaf mass by soil fertility (axis 1 of PCA)
Figure 4(a) Variation in gall richness and (b) abundance on plants of Copaifera langsdorffii among the seven studied sites/environments with different levels of stress. Same letters on bars represent grouping by contrast analysis
C‐score indices of the occurrence of galls species on Copaifera langsdorffii in the seven populations/sites analyzed. Maximum and minimum indices were calculated from 5,000 randomizations of the original matrix. The p‐values were obtained by the bi‐flow test and represent the probability that the observed index is greater, less than, or equal to that expected by randomized matrices. Observed (obs), expected (exp)
| Habitat | Indices for randomized matrices | Observed index |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | Obs. ≥ exp. | Obs. ≤ exp. | ||
| Rupestrian grasslands | 120.30 | 123.84 | 123.25 |
| .98 |
| Ironstone outcrops | 74.83 | 76.85 | 76.81 |
| .9998 |
| Cerrado sensu | 114.82 | 121.92 | 121.66 |
| .9970 |
| Arboreal cerrado | 128.66 | 132.98 | 130.78 | .552 | .456 |
| Dry forest | 115.62 | 118.62 | 117.89 | .252 | .757 |
| Riparian forest | 99.84 | 103.24 | 101.92 | .15 | .846 |
| Atlantic forest | 122.45 | 127.21 | 123.40 | .89 | .11 |
Deviance analysis of the appropriate minimum models to evaluate the effects of stress indicators (environmental and plant) on the co‐occurrence of galls of Copaifera langsdorffii in the seven different study sites/populations
| Response variables | Explanatory variables | Deviance | Residual deviance | DF |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NES | Specific leaf mass | 0.005 | 0.0054 | 6 | 94.7 | <.01 |
| NES | Aridity index | 0.001 | 0.0014 | 6 | 10.5 | .04 |
| NES | Soil fertility (PC1) | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 5 | 8.42 | .04 |
Figure 5Relationship between standardized NES C‐score values for all evaluated sites and (a) specific leaf mass, (b) soil fertility (axis 1 of the PCA), and (c) aridity index (obtained with environmental variables of each site)