Literature DB >> 31937915

High-intensity interval training for reducing blood pressure: a randomized trial vs. moderate-intensity continuous training in males with overweight or obesity.

Tomasin Clark1, Rob Morey1, Matthew D Jones1,2,3, Lauren Marcos1, Michael Ristov1, Adrian Ram1, Stefan Hakansson1,4, Aysha Franklin1, Chris McCarthy1, Leal De Carli1, Rachel Ward1, Andrew Keech5.   

Abstract

The optimal exercise-training characteristics for reducing blood pressure (BP) are unclear. We investigated the effects of 6-weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on BP and aortic stiffness in males with overweight or obesity. Twenty-eight participants (18-45 years; BMI: 25-35 kg/m2) performed stationary cycling three times per week for 6 weeks. Participants were randomly allocated (unblinded) to work-matched HIIT (N = 16; 10 × 1-min intervals at 90-100% peak workload) or MICT (N = 12; 30 min at 65-75% peak heart rate). Central (aortic) and peripheral (brachial) BP and aortic stiffness was assessed before and after training. There were no significant group × time interactions for any BP measure (all p > 0.21). HIIT induced moderate reductions in central (systolic/diastolic ∆: -4.6/-3.5 mmHg, effect size d = -0.51/-0.40) and peripheral BP (-5.2/-4 mmHg, d = -0.45/-0.47). MICT induced moderate reductions in diastolic BP only (peripheral: -3.4 mmHg, d = -0.57; central: -3 mmHg, d = -0.50). The magnitude of improvement in BP was strongly negatively correlated with baseline BP (r = -0.66 to -0.78), with stronger correlations observed for HIIT (r = -0.73 to -0.88) compared with MICT (r = -0.43 to -0.61). HIIT was effective for reducing BP (~3-5 mmHg) in the overweight to obese cohort. Exercise training induced positive changes in central (aortic) BP. The BP-lowering effects of exercise training are more prominent in those with higher baseline BP, with stronger correlation in HIIT than MICT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise training; HIIT; Hypertension; MICT; Post-exercise hypotension

Year:  2020        PMID: 31937915     DOI: 10.1038/s41440-019-0392-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  2 in total

1.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Acute Effects of Exercise on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Carpio-Rivera; José Moncada-Jiménez; Walter Salazar-Rojas; Andrea Solera-Herrera
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.000

  2 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Annual reports on hypertension research 2020.

Authors:  Masaki Mogi; Yukihito Higashi; Kanako Bokuda; Atsuhiro Ichihara; Daisuke Nagata; Atsushi Tanaka; Koichi Node; Yoichi Nozato; Koichi Yamamoto; Ken Sugimoto; Hirotaka Shibata; Satoshi Hoshide; Hitoshi Nishizawa; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  HIIT for post-COVID patients within cardiac rehabilitation: Response to letter to the editor.

Authors:  Andrew Keech; Kimberley Way; Katie Holgate; Jennifer Fildes; Praveen Indraratna; Jennifer Yu
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Sex-specific associations among total bone-specific physical activity score, aortic parameters, and body composition in healthy young adults.

Authors:  SoJung Kim; Harshvardhan Singh
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Effects of 8 Weeks of High-Intensity Interval Training and Spirulina Supplementation on Immunoglobin Levels, Cardio-Respiratory Fitness, and Body Composition of Overweight and Obese Women.

Authors:  Hadi Nobari; Elham Eyni Gandomani; Jalil Reisi; Reyhaneh Vahabidelshad; Katsuhiko Suzuki; Stella Lucia Volpe; Jorge Pérez-Gómez
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.