Literature DB >> 31937255

Automatic construction of metabolic models with enzyme constraints.

Pavlos Stephanos Bekiaris1, Steffen Klamt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to improve the accuracy of constraint-based metabolic models, several approaches have been developed which intend to integrate additional biological information. Two of these methods, MOMENT and GECKO, incorporate enzymatic (kcat) parameters and enzyme mass constraints to further constrain the space of feasible metabolic flux distributions. While both methods have been proven to deliver useful extensions of metabolic models, they may considerably increase size and complexity of the models and there is currently no tool available to fully automate generation and calibration of such enzyme-constrained models from given stoichiometric models.
RESULTS: In this work we present three major developments. We first conceived short MOMENT (sMOMENT), a simplified version of the MOMENT approach, which yields the same predictions as MOMENT but requires significantly fewer variables and enables direct inclusion of the relevant enzyme constraints in the standard representation of a constraint-based model. When measurements of enzyme concentrations are available, these can be included as well leading in the extreme case, where all enzyme concentrations are known, to a model representation that is analogous to the GECKO approach. Second, we developed the AutoPACMEN toolbox which allows an almost fully automated creation of sMOMENT-enhanced stoichiometric metabolic models. In particular, this includes the automatic read-out and processing of relevant enzymatic data from different databases and the reconfiguration of the stoichiometric model with embedded enzymatic constraints. Additionally, tools have been developed to adjust (kcat and enzyme pool) parameters of sMOMENT models based on given flux data. We finally applied the new sMOMENT approach and the AutoPACMEN toolbox to generate an enzyme-constrained version of the E. coli genome-scale model iJO1366 and analyze its key properties and differences with the standard model. In particular, we show that the enzyme constraints improve flux predictions (e.g., explaining overflow metabolism and other metabolic switches) and demonstrate, for the first time, that these constraints can markedly change the spectrum of metabolic engineering strategies for different target products.
CONCLUSIONS: The methodological and tool developments presented herein pave the way for a simplified and routine construction and analysis of enzyme-constrained metabolic models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enzyme constraints; Escherichia coli; Flux balance analysis; Metabolic modeling; Minimal cut sets; Protein allocation; Proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31937255      PMCID: PMC6961255          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3329-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  36 in total

Review 1.  In Silico Constraint-Based Strain Optimization Methods: the Quest for Optimal Cell Factories.

Authors:  Paulo Maia; Miguel Rocha; Isabel Rocha
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Observations on the carbohydrate metabolism of tumours.

Authors:  H G Crabtree
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1929       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  On the feasibility of growth-coupled product synthesis in microbial strains.

Authors:  Steffen Klamt; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 9.783

4.  Automated generation of bacterial resource allocation models.

Authors:  Ana Bulović; Stephan Fischer; Marc Dinh; Felipe Golib; Wolfram Liebermeister; Christian Poirier; Laurent Tournier; Edda Klipp; Vincent Fromion; Anne Goelzer
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 5.  Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions.

Authors:  Aarash Bordbar; Jonathan M Monk; Zachary A King; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Peter J A Cock; Tiago Antao; Jeffrey T Chang; Brad A Chapman; Cymon J Cox; Andrew Dalke; Iddo Friedberg; Thomas Hamelryck; Frank Kauff; Bartek Wilczynski; Michiel J L de Hoon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  The NCBI Taxonomy database.

Authors:  Scott Federhen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome-scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints.

Authors:  Benjamín J Sánchez; Cheng Zhang; Avlant Nilsson; Petri-Jaan Lahtvee; Eduard J Kerkhoven; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  BRENDA in 2019: a European ELIXIR core data resource.

Authors:  Lisa Jeske; Sandra Placzek; Ida Schomburg; Antje Chang; Dietmar Schomburg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  11 in total

1.  Analyzing and Resolving Infeasibility in Flux Balance Analysis of Metabolic Networks.

Authors:  Steffen Klamt; Axel von Kamp
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Reconstruction of a catalogue of genome-scale metabolic models with enzymatic constraints using GECKO 2.0.

Authors:  Benjamín Sánchez; Mihail Anton; Iván Domenzain; Eduard J Kerkhoven; Aarón Millán-Oropeza; Céline Henry; Verena Siewers; John P Morrissey; Nikolaus Sonnenschein; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 3.  Construction of Multiscale Genome-Scale Metabolic Models: Frameworks and Challenges.

Authors:  Xinyu Bi; Yanfeng Liu; Jianghua Li; Guocheng Du; Xueqin Lv; Long Liu
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  An extended and generalized framework for the calculation of metabolic intervention strategies based on minimal cut sets.

Authors:  Philipp Schneider; Axel von Kamp; Steffen Klamt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Speeding up the core algorithm for the dual calculation of minimal cut sets in large metabolic networks.

Authors:  Steffen Klamt; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan; Axel von Kamp
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Addressing uncertainty in genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction and analysis.

Authors:  David B Bernstein; Snorre Sulheim; Eivind Almaas; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Enhancing Microbiome Research through Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling.

Authors:  Nana Y D Ankrah; David B Bernstein; Matthew Biggs; Maureen Carey; Melinda Engevik; Beatriz García-Jiménez; Meiyappan Lakshmanan; Alan R Pacheco; Snorre Sulheim; Gregory L Medlock
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Yeast has evolved to minimize protein resource cost for synthesizing amino acids.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  ECMpy, a Simplified Workflow for Constructing Enzymatic Constrained Metabolic Network Model.

Authors:  Zhitao Mao; Xin Zhao; Xue Yang; Peiji Zhang; Jiawei Du; Qianqian Yuan; Hongwu Ma
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-02

10.  High-throughput and reliable acquisition of in vivo turnover number fuels precise metabolic engineering.

Authors:  Zhenghong Li; Chengyu Zhang; Zhengduo Wang; Chuan Li; Zhiheng Yang; Zilong Li; Lixin Zhang; Weishan Wang
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.