| Literature DB >> 31937098 |
Naomi Kakushima1, Masao Yoshida1, Yohei Yabuuchi1, Noboru Kawata1, Kohei Takizawa1, Yoshihiro Kishida1, Sayo Ito1, Kenichiro Imai1, Kinichi Hotta1, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari1, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi1, Hiroyuki Ono1.
Abstract
Prediction of histology by endoscopic examination is important in the clinical management of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs), including adenoma and adenocarcinoma. The use of a simple scoring system based on the findings of white-light endoscopy or magnified endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is useful to differentiate between Vienna category 3 (C3) and C4/5 lesions. Less invasive endoscopic resection procedures, such as cold snare polypectomy, are quick to perform and convenient for small (<10 mm) C3 lesions. Neoplasms with higher grade histology, such as C4/5 lesions, should be treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgery. Although EMR often requires piecemeal resection, the complication rate is acceptable. Excellent complete resection rates could be achieved by ESD; however, it remains a challenging method considering the high risk of complications. Shielding or closure of the ulcer after ESD is effective at decreasing the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery is an ideal treatment with a high rate of en bloc resection and a low rate of complications, although it is limited to high-volume centers. Patients with NADETs could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to stratify the optimal treatment based on endoscopic diagnoses.Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery; Nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors
Year: 2020 PMID: 31937098 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Endosc ISSN: 2234-2400