| Literature DB >> 31936564 |
Jun Weng1, Xiaoyun Bian1, Ke Kou1, Tianhong Lian1.
Abstract
In a high accuracy strapdown inertial navigation system (SINS), the ring laser gyroscope's (RLG) bias changes and the performance decreases due to factors in the RLG's self-heating and changes in ambient temperature. Therefore, it is important to study the bias temperature drift characteristics of RLGs in high, low, and variable temperature environments. In this paper, a composite temperature calibration scheme is proposed. The composite temperature model introduces the derivative term and the temperature derivative cross-multiplier on the basis of the static model and sets the overlap regions for the piecewise least squares fitting. The results show that the composite temperature model can compensate the bias trend term well at ambient temperature, improve the fitting accuracy, and smooth the output curve. The compensation method has a small amount of calculations and flexible parameter design. The precision of the laser gyros in one SINS is improved by about 64.9%, 15.7%, and 3.6%, respectively, which has certain engineering application value.Entities:
Keywords: overlap; piecewise least squares fitting; ring laser gyroscope; temperature compensation
Year: 2020 PMID: 31936564 PMCID: PMC7013679 DOI: 10.3390/s20020377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the overlap calculation.
Figure 2The ring laser gyroscope (RLG) temperature calibration flow chart.
Figure 3The thermostat for RLG temperature experiments.
Figure 4Static output value of the Z-axis RLG and its fitted curve—with and without overlap.
The RLGs bias before and after temperature compensation (pulses).
| Uncompensated | Compensated | Compensated (Overlap) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0233 | 0.0174 | 0.0173 | |
| 0.0280 | 0.0190 | 0.0189 | |
| 0.0335 | 0.0086 | 0.0071 |
Figure 5Bias of RLGs before and after the static temperature model compensation. (a) X-axis of gyro; (b) Y-axis of gyro; (c) Z-axis of gyro.
Table of fitting coefficients of static data.
| Temperature Segment ( | Model Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1/(−15–15 °C) | 0.0173 | −0.0014 | 1.7535 | |
| 2/(5–35 °C) | 0.0064 | 0.0004 | −4.2567 | |
| 3/(25–60 °C) | −0.0551 | 0.0026 | −3.302 | |
| 4/(50–80 °C) | 0.3390 | −0.0118 | 9.6146 | |
| 1/(−15–15 °C) | 0.0184 | −0.0014 | −3.1281 | |
| 2/(5–35 °C) | 0.0187 | −0.0010 | 1.3435 | |
| 3/(25–60 °C) | 0.0884 | −0.0040 | 4.1885 | |
| 4/(50–80 °C) | 0.1204 | −0.0033 | 1.5919 | |
| 1/(−15–15 °C) | 0.0167 | 0.0004 | −2.0700 | |
| 2/(5–35 °C) | 0.0036 | −0.0009 | 3.9374 | |
| 3/(25–60 °C) | 0.0635 | −0.0042 | 6.5480 | |
| 4/(50–80 °C) | −0.0974 | 0.0032 | −2.7658 | |
Figure 6Bias of RLG before and after the static temperature model compensation. (a) X-axis of gyro; (b) Y-axis of gyro; (c) Z-axis of gyro.
Figure 7The RLG’s bias curve with static and composite temperature model compensation. (a) X-axis of gyro; (b) Y-axis of gyro; (c) Z-axis of gyro.
The RLG’s bias before and after temperature compensation (pulses).
| Uncompensated | Static Compensation | Composite Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0533 | 0.0512 | 0.0187 | |
| 0.0229 | 0.0232 | 0.0193 | |
| 0.0471 | 0.0467 | 0.0454 |