| Literature DB >> 31935638 |
Jennifer L Whitwell1, Nirubol Tosakulwong2, Hugo Botha3, Farwa Ali3, Heather M Clark3, Joseph R Duffy3, Rene L Utianski3, Chase A Stevens3, Stephen D Weigand2, Christopher G Schwarz4, Matthew L Senjem5, Clifford R Jack4, Val J Lowe4, J Eric Ahlskog3, Dennis W Dickson6, Keith A Josephs3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Atypical; Flortaucipir; MRI; PET; PSP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31935638 PMCID: PMC6961761 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Demographics and clinical findings across PSP variants.
| No. Female (%) | 24 (45%) | 4 (33%) | 2 (50%) | 15 (65%) | 5 (62%) | 3 (60%) | 0.46 |
| APOE ε4 carriers | 6 (22%) | 2 (25%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (10%) | 1 (33%) | NA | 0.55 |
| Education | 15 [13, 16] | 15 [13, 18] | 15 [14, 16] | 15 [12, 16] | 12 [10, 14] | NA | 0.45 |
| Age at scan, yrs | 68 [65, 72] | 70 [66, 74] | 75 [73, 79] | 75 [72, 80] | 72 [67, 76] | 69 [67, 74] | 0.006 |
| Age at onset, yrs | 65 [61, 69] | 63 [57, 68] | 72 [69, 76] | 68 [66, 72] | 67 [63, 72] | 65 [64, 71] | 0.10 |
| Disease duration | 3.4 [2.0, 4.0] | 6.6 [4.8, 8.5] | 2.5 [2.0, 3.0] | 6.3 [4.2, 7.6] | 3.8 [3.0, 4.0] | 3.4 [2.0, 4.0] | <0.001 |
| MoCA (/30) | 23 [20, 26] | 24 [24, 28] | 26 [26, 26] | 19 [16, 25] | 22 [21, 26] | 19 [8, 26] | 0.03 |
| FAB (/18) | 14 [12, 15] | 14 [14, 16] | 14 [12, 15] | 11 [8, 14] | 12 [9, 14] | 13 [10, 16] | 0.02 |
| MDS-UPDRS III (/132) | 41 [31, 51] | 48 [38, 57] | 45 [36, 54] | 54 [34, 68] | 48 [42, 56] | 40 [33, 42] | 0.054 |
| PSP Rating Scale (/100) | 40 [32, 49] | 39 [35, 42] | 40 [36, 45] | 47 [36, 59] | 43 [36, 53] | 43 [36, 50] | 0.40 |
| PSP Rating Scale gait-midline (/20) | 11 [6, 15] | 13 [10, 16] | 14 [13, 16] | 12 [9, 14] | 13 [11, 16] | 12 [10, 16] | 0.68 |
| PSP oculomotor impairment scale (/5) | 3 [3, 4] | 2 [2, 3] | 2 [2, 2] | 2 [2, 3] | 3 [3, 3] | 2 [2, 3] | 0.002 |
| Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale II (/64) | 5 [2, 7] | 3 [1, 4] | 2 [2, 4] | 24 [16, 36] | 7 [1, 11] | NA | <0.001 |
Data shown as N (%) or median [inter-quartile range]. P values calculated using analysis of variance regression. MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorders Society Sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; MoCA = Montreal cognitive Assessment Battery; FAB = Frontal Assessment Battery; NA = not available.
Fig. 1Three-dimensional brain renderings showing patterns of grey (shown in red) and white (shown in blue) matter volume loss in each PSP variant compared to controls. Results are uncorrected for multiple comparisons at p<0.001.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Estimated log-transformed MRI volumes from Linear Mixed-Effects Models. For each boxplot the circle is the estimated mean from the model, with the thick color line showing the 84% confidence interval and the thin grey line showing the 95% confidence interval.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Voxel-wise Flortaucipir findings in each PSP variant compared to controls. Results are shown on axial slices at the level of the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum and at the level of the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus; coronal slices at the level of motor cortex and premotor cortex; and a sagittal slice at the level of the red nucleus. Results for the PSP-RS variant are shown in red, the PSP-SL variant in blue, the PSP-P variant in yellow and the PSP-PGF variant in green. Results are uncorrected for multiple comparisons at p<0.001. Top row illustrates the location of the subcortical nuclei from the atlases. DN = dentate nucleus of the cerebellum; Put = putamen; CN = caudate nucleus; RN = red nucleus; STN = subthalamic nucleus; SN = substantia nigra; Thal = thalamus; GP = globus pallidus; R = right.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4Flortaucipir SUVR images for the three PSP-CBS patients.
Fig.. 5Estimated log-transformed flortaucipir SUVR from Linear Mixed-Effects Models. For each boxplot the circle is the estimated mean from the model, with the thick color line showing the 84% confidence interval and the thin grey line showing the 95% confidence interval.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6Semi-quantitative tau burden measures in the autopsy confirmed PSP cases.
Fig. 7Schematic depiction of the involvement of PSP-related subcortical circuitry in each PSP variant. Dark shading indicates clear involvement of a structure on neuroimaging, whereas light shading indicates mild involvement. GP =globus pallidus; STh = subthalamic nucleus; RN = red nucleus; SN = substantia nigra; DN = dentate nucleus of the cerebellum; SCP = superior cerebellar peduncle.(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)