| Literature DB >> 31935274 |
Zakir Hossain1, Rozina Akter1, Nasrin Sultana2, Enamul Kabir3.
Abstract
Overdispersion in count data analysis is very common in many practical fields of health sciences. Ignorance of the presence of overdispersion in such data analysis may cause misleading inferences and thus lead to incorrect interpretations of the results. Researchers should account for the consequences of overdispersion and need to select the correct choice of models for the analysis of such data. In this paper, Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) are applied in modelling and analysis of antenatal care (ANC) count data extracted from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2014. Pearson chi-square and different score tests are used to investigate the effect of overdispersion in the analysis. Overdispersion is found to be significant in the antenatal health care count data and so appropriate modelling is used to produce valid inferences for the regression parameters. The zero-truncated negative binomial regression (0-NBR) is found to be the best choice for analysing such data while excluding zero counts. Study findings reveal that place of residence, order of birth, exposure to mass media, wealth index and education of mother have significant impacts on the ANC status of women during pregnancy in Bangladesh.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31935274 PMCID: PMC6959570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Frequency and percent distribution of ANC visiting status of pregnant women who received antenatal care from a medically trained health care provider in Bangladesh.
| Number of ANC visits | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 719 | 20.7 |
| 2 | 731 | 21.0 |
| 3 | 605 | 17.4 |
| 4 or higher | 1423 | 40.9 |
| Total | 3478 | 100 |
Detection of overdispersion based on Pearson residual χ2-statistic for different models with AIC values and score tests of significance of overdispersion to antenatal health care count data in Bangladesh.
| Detection and Model Selection | Test (PR model) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | AIC | Method | z-score | SE | ||
| PR | 1.394 | 4.228 | Dean and Lawless | 0.276 | 0.029 | <0.001 |
| NBR | 1.056 | 4.178 | Winkelmann | 0.193 | 0.020 | <0.001 |
| 0-NBR | Cameron and Trivedi | 0.385 | 0.041 | <0.001 | ||
Impact of socio-economic and demographic determinants on antenatal health care of women during pregnancy in Bangladesh along with parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), p-values and IRRs obtained from fitting 0-NBR model.
| Covariate | Estimate | SE | IRR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.657 | 0.073 | <0.001 | – |
| Barisal | -0.043 | 0.051 | 0.400 | 0.96 |
| Chittagong | -0.069 | 0.043 | 0.112 | 0.93 |
| Dhaka | – | – | – | – |
| Khulna | 0.133 | 0.046 | 0.004 | 1.14 |
| Rajshahi | -0.008 | 0.048 | 0.874 | 0.99 |
| Rangpur | 0.200 | 0.047 | <0.001 | 1.22 |
| Sylhet | -0.069 | 0.050 | 0.166 | 0.93 |
| Rural | – | – | – | – |
| Urban | 0.176 | 0.030 | <0.001 | 1.19 |
| 1 | 0.032 | 0.035 | 0.356 | 1.03 |
| 2–3 | – | – | – | – |
| 4 or higher | -0.141 | 0.053 | 0.008 | 0.87 |
| <20 | -0.070 | 0.036 | 0.050 | 0.93 |
| 20–35 | – | – | – | – |
| <35 | -0.019 | 0.086 | 0.823 | 0.98 |
| Non–exposed | – | – | – | – |
| Exposed | 0.108 | 0.037 | 0.004 | 1.11 |
| No education | – | – | – | – |
| Primary | 0.119 | 0.059 | 0.043 | 1.13 |
| Secondary | 0.249 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 1.28 |
| Higher | 0.476 | 0.065 | <0.001 | 1.61 |
| Poor | 0.003 | 0.043 | 0.940 | 1.00 |
| middle | – | – | – | – |
| Rich | 0.110 | 0.039 | <0.001 | 1.12 |
| No | – | – | – | – |
| Yes | 0.033 | 0.034 | 0.320 | 1.03 |
| No | – | – | – | – |
| Yes | 0.033 | 0.032 | 0.295 | 1.03 |