Lucas Maciel Rabello1, Iris Sophie Albers1, Mathijs van Ark1,2,3, Ron L Diercks4, Inge van den Akker-Scheek1, Johannes Zwerver1. 1. Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Centre of Expertise Primary Care Groningen (ECEZG), Peescentrum (Tendon Centre), The Netherlands. 4. Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Several studies have been conducted to better understand the effect of load on the Achilles tendon structure. However, the effect of a high cumulative load consisting of repetitive cyclic movements, such as those that occur during the running of a marathon, on Achilles tendon structure is not yet clear. Clinicians, coaches, and athletes will benefit from knowledge about the effects of a marathon on the structure of the Achilles tendon. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term response of the Achilles tendon structure to running a marathon. DESIGN: Case series (prospective). SETTING: Sports medicine centers. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ten male nonelite runners who ran in a marathon. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Tendon structure was assessed before and 2 and 7 days after a marathon using ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC), an imaging tool that quantifies tendon organization in 4 echo types (I-IV). Echo type I represents the most stable echo pattern, and echo type IV, the least stable. RESULTS: At 7 days postmarathon, both the insertional and midportion structure changed significantly. At both sites, the percentage of echo type II increased (insertion P < .01; midportion P = .02) and the percentages of echo types III and IV decreased (type III: insertion P = .01; midportion P = .02; type IV: insertion P = .01; midportion P < .01). Additionally, at the insertion, the percentage of echo type I decreased (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We observed the effects of running a marathon on the Achilles tendon structure 7 days after the event. Running the marathon combined with the activity performed shortly thereafter might have caused the changes in tendon structure. This result emphasizes the importance of sufficient recovery time after running a marathon to prevent overuse injuries.
CONTEXT: Several studies have been conducted to better understand the effect of load on the Achilles tendon structure. However, the effect of a high cumulative load consisting of repetitive cyclic movements, such as those that occur during the running of a marathon, on Achilles tendon structure is not yet clear. Clinicians, coaches, and athletes will benefit from knowledge about the effects of a marathon on the structure of the Achilles tendon. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term response of the Achilles tendon structure to running a marathon. DESIGN: Case series (prospective). SETTING: Sports medicine centers. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ten male nonelite runners who ran in a marathon. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Tendon structure was assessed before and 2 and 7 days after a marathon using ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC), an imaging tool that quantifies tendon organization in 4 echo types (I-IV). Echo type I represents the most stable echo pattern, and echo type IV, the least stable. RESULTS: At 7 days postmarathon, both the insertional and midportion structure changed significantly. At both sites, the percentage of echo type II increased (insertion P < .01; midportion P = .02) and the percentages of echo types III and IV decreased (type III: insertion P = .01; midportion P = .02; type IV: insertion P = .01; midportion P < .01). Additionally, at the insertion, the percentage of echo type I decreased (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We observed the effects of running a marathon on the Achilles tendon structure 7 days after the event. Running the marathon combined with the activity performed shortly thereafter might have caused the changes in tendon structure. This result emphasizes the importance of sufficient recovery time after running a marathon to prevent overuse injuries.
Authors: Omar W Heyward; Lucas M Rabello; Lucas van der Woude; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Alli Gokeler; Henk van der Worp; Johannes Zwerver Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: H T M van Schie; R J de Vos; S de Jonge; E M Bakker; M P Heijboer; J A N Verhaar; J L Tol; H Weinans Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Samuel D Rosengarten; Jill L Cook; Adam L Bryant; Justin T Cordy; John Daffy; Sean I Docking Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Daniel M Cushman; Ziva Petrin; Keith Cummings; Sarah F Eby; Joy English; Masaru Teramoto Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Silvia Ortega-Cebrián; Ramon Navarro; Sergi Seda; Sebastià Salas; Myriam Guerra-Balic Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Daniel M Cushman; Ziva Petrin; Sarah Eby; Nathan D Clements; Peter Haight; Brian Snitily; Masaru Teramoto Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 2.241