Literature DB >> 31935028

Effect of Osocimab in Preventing Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty: The FOXTROT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jeffrey I Weitz1,2, Rupert Bauersachs3,4, Bastian Becker5, Scott D Berkowitz5, Maria C S Freitas5, Michael R Lassen6, Carola Metzig5, Gary E Raskob7.   

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy of factor XIa inhibition for thromboprophylaxis is unknown. Osocimab is a long-acting, fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits factor XIa. Objective: To compare different doses of osocimab with enoxaparin and apixaban for thromboprophylaxis in patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, phase 2 noninferiority trial with observer blinding for osocimab doses, conducted at 54 hospitals in 13 countries. Adult patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroplasty were randomized from October 2017 through August 2018 and followed up until January 2019. Interventions: Single intravenous osocimab postoperative doses of 0.3 mg/kg (n = 107), 0.6 mg/kg (n = 65), 1.2 mg/kg (n = 108), or 1.8 mg/kg (n = 106); preoperative doses of 0.3 mg/kg (n = 109) or 1.8 mg/kg (n = 108); or 40 mg of subcutaneous enoxaparin once daily (n = 105) or 2.5 mg of oral apixaban twice daily (n = 105) for at least 10 days or until venography. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism incidence between 10 and 13 days postoperatively (assessed by mandatory bilateral venography performed 10 to 13 days after surgery or confirmed symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). A 5% noninferiority margin compared with enoxaparin was chosen. The primary safety outcome of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was assessed until 10 to 13 days postoperatively.
Results: Of 813 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 66.5 years [8.2 years]; body mass index, 32.7 [5.7]; and 74.2% women), 600 were included in the per-protocol population used for the primary analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 18 patients (23.7%) receiving 0.3 mg/kg, 8 (15.7%) receiving 0.6 mg/kg, 13 (16.5%) receiving 1.2 mg/kg, and 14 (17.9%) receiving 1.8 mg/kg of osocimab postoperatively; 23 (29.9%) receiving 0.3 mg/kg and 9 (11.3%) receiving 1.8 mg/kg of osocimab preoperatively; 20 (26.3%) receiving enoxaparin; and 12 (14.5%) receiving apixaban. Osocimab given postoperatively met criteria for noninferiority compared with enoxaparin with risk differences (1-sided 95% CIs) of 10.6% (95% CI, -1.2% to ∞) at the 0.6-mg/kg dose; 9.9% (95% CI, -0.9% to ∞) at the 1.2-mg/kg dose, and 8.4% (95% CI, -2.6 to ∞) at the 1.8-mg/kg dose. The preoperative dose of 1.8 mg/kg of osocimab met criteria for superiority compared with enoxaparin with a risk difference of 15.1%; 2-sided 90% CI, 4.9% to 25.2%). Postoperative and preoperative doses of 0.3 mg/kg of osocimab did not meet the prespecified criteria for noninferiority, with risk differences (1-sided 95% CIs) of 2.6% (95% CI, -8.9% to ∞) and -3.6% (95% CI, -15.5% to ∞), respectively. Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was observed in up to 4.7% of those receiving osocimab, 5.9% receiving enoxaparin, and 2% receiving apixaban. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, postoperative osocimab 0.6 mg/kg, 1.2 mg/kg, and 1.8 mg/kg met criteria for noninferiority compared with enoxaparin, and the preoperative 1.8-mg/kg dose of osocimab met criteria for superiority compared with enoxaparin for the primary outcome of incidence of venous thromboembolism at 10 to 13 days postoperatively. Further studies are needed to establish efficacy and safety of osocimab relative to standard thromboprophylaxis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03276143.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31935028      PMCID: PMC6990695          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.20687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

1.  Allosteric Inhibition as a New Mode of Action for BAY 1213790, a Neutralizing Antibody Targeting the Activated Form of Coagulation Factor XI.

Authors:  Martina Schaefer; Anja Buchmueller; Frank Dittmer; Julia Straßburger; Andreas Wilmen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial.

Authors:  Michael Rud Lassen; Gary E Raskob; Alexander Gallus; Graham Pineo; Dalei Chen; Philip Hornick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Factor XI antisense oligonucleotide for prevention of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Harry R Büller; Claudette Bethune; Sanjay Bhanot; David Gailani; Brett P Monia; Gary E Raskob; Annelise Segers; Peter Verhamme; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis.

Authors:  Nigel Mackman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Factor XI activation in a revised model of blood coagulation.

Authors:  D Gailani; G J Broze
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael R Lassen; Walter Ageno; Lars C Borris; Jay R Lieberman; Nadia Rosencher; Tiemo J Bandel; Frank Misselwitz; Alexander G G Turpie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Feedback activation of factor XI by thrombin in plasma results in additional formation of thrombin that protects fibrin clots from fibrinolysis.

Authors:  P A von dem Borne; J C Meijers; B N Bouma
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael Rud Lassen; Gary E Raskob; Alexander Gallus; Graham Pineo; Dalei Chen; Ronald J Portman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Congenital factor XI deficiency: an update.

Authors:  Stefano Duga; Ophira Salomon
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.180

10.  BAY 1213790, a fully human IgG1 antibody targeting coagulation factor XIa: First evaluation of safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Dirk Thomas; Kirstin Thelen; Stefanie Kraff; Stephan Schwers; Sonja Schiffer; Sigrun Unger; Ashraf Yassen; Stefanie Boxnick
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-02-14
View more
  31 in total

1.  Multimodal Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With a History of Venous Thromboembolism Undergoing Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Drake G LeBrun; Eduardo A Salvati; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 2.  Factor XI Inhibition for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: An Update on Current Evidence and Future perspectives.

Authors:  Geraldine Poenou; Teona Dumitru Dumitru; Ludovic Lafaie; Valentine Mismetti; Marco Heestermans; Laurent Bertoletti
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  Factor XI as a target for preventing venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  David Gailani
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 16.036

4.  Milvexian for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John Strony; Walter Ageno; David Gailani; Elaine M Hylek; Michael R Lassen; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Ravi S Notani; Robin Roberts; Annelise Segers; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 176.079

5.  A proposal for managing bleeding in patients on therapeutic factor XI(a) inhibitors.

Authors:  Ophira Salomon; David Gailani
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 16.036

6.  Making anticoagulation safer.

Authors:  David Gailani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 202.731

7.  Improved efficacy/safety profile of factor XIa inhibitor BMS-724296 versus factor Xa inhibitor apixaban and thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Pancras C Wong; Mimi L Quan
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 8.  The rebirth of the contact pathway: a new therapeutic target.

Authors:  Priyanka Srivastava; David Gailani
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.218

9.  The contact activation system as a potential therapeutic target in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Joseph J Shatzel; Emma P DeLoughery; Christina U Lorentz; Erik I Tucker; Joseph E Aslan; Monica T Hinds; David Gailani; Jeffrey I Weitz; Owen J T McCarty; Andras Gruber
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 10.  Factor XI Inhibition to Uncouple Thrombosis From Hemostasis: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Charles Hsu; Edward Hutt; Daniel M Bloomfield; David Gailani; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 27.203

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.