Literature DB >> 31933498

Making the A Priori Procedure Work for Differences Between Means.

David Trafimow1, Cong Wang1, Tonghui Wang1.   

Abstract

Previous researchers have proposed the a priori procedure, whereby the researcher specifies, prior to data collection, how closely she wishes the sample means to approach corresponding population means, and the degree of confidence of meeting the specification. However, an important limitation of previous research is that researchers sometimes are interested in differences between means, rather than in the means themselves. To address this limitation, we propose additional equations that expand the a priori procedure to handle differences between means, both in matched and in independent samples. Finally, implications are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords:  a priori procedure; independent samples; matched samples; means

Year:  2019        PMID: 31933498      PMCID: PMC6943990          DOI: 10.1177/0013164419847509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  4 in total

1.  The sampling precision of research in five major areas of psychology.

Authors:  David Trafimow; Hunter A Myüz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

2.  Using the Coefficient of Confidence to Make the Philosophical Switch From A Posteriori to A Priori Inferential Statistics.

Authors:  David Trafimow
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Performing Inferential Statistics Prior to Data Collection.

Authors:  David Trafimow; Justin A MacDonald
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  From a Sampling Precision Perspective, Skewness Is a Friend and Not an Enemy!

Authors:  David Trafimow; Tonghui Wang; Cong Wang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.821

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.