Literature DB >> 31931977

Adjustable gastric band surgery or medical management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: three-year results of a randomized trial.

Donald C Simonson1, Ashley Vernon2, Kathleen Foster3, Florencia Halperin4, Mary Elizabeth Patti3, Allison B Goldfine5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few randomized trials have compared surgical versus lifestyle and pharmacologic approaches for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with mild to moderate obesity.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined resolution of hyperglycemia (A1C <6.5% and fasting glucose <126 mg/dL) 3 years after randomization to either a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) or 1-year diabetes and weight management (DWM) program.
SETTING: University medical center, United States.
METHODS: Forty T2D patients (mean ± SD: age, 51.3 ±10.0 yr; weight 109.5 ± 15.0 kg; body mass index [BMI] 36.5 ± 3.7 kg/m2; HBA1C 8.2% ± 1.2%) were randomized to LAGB (n = 18) or DWM (n = 22).
RESULTS: At 3 years, 13% of 16 patients in LAGB and 5% of 17 patients in DWM achieved resolution of hyperglycemia (P = .601), with a modestly greater reduction in antidiabetic medications in the surgical group (P = .054). Reductions from baseline in A1C were sustained at 3 years in LAGB (-.82% [95% CI: -1.62 to -.01], P = .046) compared with DWM (+.23% [95% CI: -.57 to 1.03], P = .567). The surgical group had greater weight loss (-12.0 kg [95% CI: -15.9 to -8.1] versus -4.8 [95% CI: -8.6 to -.9], P = .010). HDL-cholesterol increased more after surgery (P = .003), but changes in triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and blood pressure did not differ between treatments. Diabetes- and obesity-specific quality of life improved comparably with both therapies.
CONCLUSIONS: Achievement of American Diabetes Association targets for glucose, lipids, and blood pressure was similar with both treatment strategies. LAGB leads to greater sustained weight loss and higher HDL cholesterol compared with a DWM program. These findings may help guide patients with T2D and obesity when exploring options for diabetes and weight management.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band; Obesity; Patient-reported outcomes; Weight management; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31931977     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Bariatric Surgery Versus Non-Surgical Treatment on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laicheng Wang; Meihua Lin; Jianjian Yu; Zongcheng Fan; Shunpeng Zhang; Yunchai Lin; Xin Chen; Feng Peng
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D): Study rationale, design, and methods.

Authors:  Donald C Simonson; Bo Hu; David E Arterburn; Philip R Schauer; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Anita P Courcoulas; David E Cummings; Mary-Elizabeth Patti; William F Gourash; Ashley H Vernon; John M Jakicic; John P Kirwan
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.408

Review 3.  Body composition changes at 12 months following different surgical weight loss interventions in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Amy Sylivris; Jakub Mesinovic; David Scott; Paul Jansons
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 10.867

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.