Heidi D Nelson1, Amy Cantor1, Jesse Wagner1, Rebecca Jungbauer1, Ana Quiñones2, Lucy Stillman1, Karli Kondo3. 1. Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N., A.C., J.W., R.J., L.S.). 2. Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, Oregon (A.Q.). 3. Portland VA Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.).
Abstract
Background: Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. Purpose: To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. Data Sources: English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. Study Selection: Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. Data Synthesis: No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient-provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. Limitation: Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. Conclusion: In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018109263).
Background: Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. Purpose: To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. Data Sources: English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. Study Selection: Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. Data Synthesis: No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient-provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. Limitation: Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. Conclusion: In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018109263).
Authors: Sonja J Meiers; Evan Dyce; Mark L Wieland; Christi Patten; Matthew M Clark; Marcelo M K Hanza; Carrie Bronars; Julie A Nigon; Irene G Sia Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem; Chandra L Jackson; Mary Ann Ottinger; Andres Cardenas; Katherine A James; Kristen M C Malecki; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Andrew M Geller; Uchechi A Mitchell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kathy L Rush; Lindsay Burton; Cherisse L Seaton; Mindy A Smith; Eric P H Li; Charlene E Ronquillo; Khalad Hasan; Selena Davis; Mona Mattei Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-07-21
Authors: Eduardo J Santiago-Rodríguez; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Jacqueline M Torres; Urmimala Sarkar; Robert A Hiatt Journal: Ethn Health Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 2.732