Literature DB >> 31930623

A protein-centric approach for exome variant aggregation enables sensitive association analysis with clinical outcomes.

Ginny X H Li1,2, Dan Munro3, Damian Fermin4, Christine Vogel3, Hyungwon Choi1,5.   

Abstract

Somatic mutations are early drivers of tumorigenesis and tumor progression. However, the mutations typically occur at variable positions across different individuals, resulting in the data being too sparse to test meaningful associations between variants and phenotypes. To overcome this challenge, we devised a novel approach called Gene-to-Protein-to-Disease (GPD) which accumulates variants into new sequence units as the degree of genetic assault on structural or functional units of each protein. The variant frequencies in the sequence units were highly reproducible between two large cancer cohorts. Survival analysis identified 232 sequence units in which somatic mutations had deleterious effects on overall survival, including consensus driver mutations obtained from multiple calling algorithms. By contrast, around 76% of the survival predictive units had been undetected by conventional gene-level analysis. We demonstrate the ability of these signatures to separate patient groups according to overall survival, therefore, providing novel prognostic tools for various cancers. GPD also identified sequence units with somatic mutations whose impact on survival was modified by the occupancy of germline variants in the surrounding regions. The findings indicate that a patient's genetic predisposition interacts with the effect of somatic mutations on survival outcomes in some cancers.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exome sequence variants; prognostic signatures; sequence units

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31930623      PMCID: PMC7160030          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  39 in total

1.  Germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and ten-year survival for women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Francisco J Candido-dos-Reis; Honglin Song; Ellen L Goode; Julie M Cunningham; Brooke L Fridley; Melissa C Larson; Kathryn Alsop; Ed Dicks; Patricia Harrington; Susan J Ramus; Anna de Fazio; Gillian Mitchell; Sian Fereday; Kelly L Bolton; Charlie Gourley; Caroline Michie; Beth Karlan; Jenny Lester; Christine Walsh; Ilana Cass; Håkan Olsson; Martin Gore; Javier J Benitez; Maria J Garcia; Irene Andrulis; Anna Marie Mulligan; Gord Glendon; Ignacio Blanco; Conxi Lazaro; Alice S Whittemore; Valerie McGuire; Weiva Sieh; Marco Montagna; Elisa Alducci; Siegal Sadetzki; Angela Chetrit; Ava Kwong; Susanne K Kjaer; Allan Jensen; Estrid Høgdall; Susan Neuhausen; Robert Nussbaum; Mary Daly; Mark H Greene; Phuong L Mai; Jennifer T Loud; Kirsten Moysich; Amanda E Toland; Diether Lambrechts; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; James D Brenton; Marc Tischkowitz; Douglas F Easton; Antonis Antoniou; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Simon A Gayther; David Bowtell; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells.

Authors:  Iñigo Martincorena; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Perspective on Oncogenic Processes at the End of the Beginning of Cancer Genomics.

Authors:  Li Ding; Matthew H Bailey; Eduard Porta-Pardo; Vesteinn Thorsson; Antonio Colaprico; Denis Bertrand; David L Gibbs; Amila Weerasinghe; Kuan-Lin Huang; Collin Tokheim; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Reyka Jayasinghe; Feng Chen; Lihua Yu; Sam Sun; Catharina Olsen; Jaegil Kim; Alison M Taylor; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Chayaporn Suphavilai; Niranjan Nagarajan; Joshua M Stuart; Gordon B Mills; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Benjamin G Vincent; Carolyn M Hutter; Jean Claude Zenklusen; Katherine A Hoadley; Michael C Wendl; Llya Shmulevich; Alexander J Lazar; David A Wheeler; Gad Getz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Interaction Landscape of Inherited Polymorphisms with Somatic Events in Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Carter; Rachel Marty; Matan Hofree; Andrew M Gross; James Jensen; Kathleen M Fisch; Xingyu Wu; Christopher DeBoever; Eric L Van Nostrand; Yan Song; Emily Wheeler; Jason F Kreisberg; Scott M Lippman; Gene W Yeo; J Silvio Gutkind; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  L1CAM is an independent predictor of poor survival in endometrial cancer - An analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Authors:  Thanh H Dellinger; David D Smith; Ching Ouyang; Charles D Warden; John C Williams; Ernest S Han
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

Authors:  Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Predicting the functional consequences of cancer-associated amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  Hashem A Shihab; Julian Gough; David N Cooper; Ian N M Day; Tom R Gaunt
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  NetNorM: Capturing cancer-relevant information in somatic exome mutation data with gene networks for cancer stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  Marine Le Morvan; Andrei Zinovyev; Jean-Philippe Vert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Network-Based Coverage of Mutational Profiles Reveals Cancer Genes.

Authors:  Borislav H Hristov; Mona Singh
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 10.304

10.  Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits.

Authors:  Joseph K Pickrell; Tomaz Berisa; Jimmy Z Liu; Laure Ségurel; Joyce Y Tung; David A Hinds
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computationally scalable regression modeling for ultrahigh-dimensional omics data with ParProx.

Authors:  Seyoon Ko; Ginny X Li; Hyungwon Choi; Joong-Ho Won
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.