Literature DB >> 3193057

Absolute and relative measures of dimensional contrast.

J M Hinson1.   

Abstract

Two sets of experiments examined the discriminative performance of pigeons on a visual flicker-rate continuum using a maintained generalization procedure. In the first experiment, responses during the intermediate stimulus value were not reinforced, whereas responses during all other stimuli were reinforced periodically. In the second experiment, training was similar to the first, with the exception of one condition in which stimuli adjacent to the negative stimulus border were eliminated from the discrimination set. Results from both experiments show that positive dimensional contrast seems to represent a relative enhancement of discrimination gradient form, rather than an absolute increase in responding with respect to prior baseline. Further, the form and magnitude of positive dimensional contrast are not predictable from the form and magnitude of baseline response rates. Results from the second experiment indicate that eliminating border stimuli increased response-rate differences between positive and negative stimuli, but did not necessarily diminish the magnitude of positive dimensional contrast.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3193057      PMCID: PMC1338872          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: a test of the summation hypothesis.

Authors:  H I KALISH; N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-04

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.

Authors:  H I KALISH; N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-02

5.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

6.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus-specific contrast effects during operant discrimination learning.

Authors:  J C Malone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function.

Authors:  C A Boneau; J L Cole
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  De Lange characteristics for the fresh-water turtle Chrysemys picta picta, and the pigeon Columba livia.

Authors:  V Graf
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Local contrast and maintained generalization.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J C Malone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Discrete and continuous measures of dimensional stimulus control.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J J Higa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.