Literature DB >> 31930520

Timing of arrival in the breeding area is repeatable and affects reproductive success in a non-migratory population of blue tits.

Carol Gilsenan1, Mihai Valcu1, Bart Kempenaers1.   

Abstract

Events in one part of the annual cycle often affect the performance (and subsequently fitness) of individuals later in the season (carry-over effects). An important aspect of this relates to the timing of activities. For example, many studies on migratory birds have shown that relatively late-spring arrival in the breeding area reduces both the likelihood of getting a mate or territory and reproductive success. In contrast, relatively little is known about the movements of individuals in non-migratory populations during the non-breeding season. Few studies have investigated the timing of arrival at the breeding area in such species, possibly due to the assumption that most individuals remain in the area during the non-breeding season. In this study, we used 4 years of data from a transponder-based automated recording system set up in a non-migratory population of blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus to describe individual variation in arrival at the breeding site. We investigated whether this variation can be explained by individual characteristics (sex, body size or status), and we assessed its effect on aspects of reproductive success in the subsequent breeding season. We found substantial variation in arrival date and demonstrate that this trait is individual-specific (repeatable). Females arrived later than males, but the arrival dates of social pair members were more similar than expected by chance, which suggests that individuals may mate assortatively depending on their arrival in the breeding area. Arrival predicted both whether an individual would end up breeding that season and several aspects of its breeding success. Our study suggests that individuals of non-migratory species leave the breeding area during the non-breeding season. Hence, it may be useful to consider variation in the scale of movements between breeding and non-breeding sites, rather than using a simple dichotomy between 'resident' and 'migratory' species. We conclude that the timing of pre-breeding events, in particular arrival date, may be an overlooked, but important, fitness-relevant trait in non-migratory species.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of the British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Cyanistes caeruleuszzm321990; arrival date; carry-over effect; non-breeding season; repeatability; resident; winter

Year:  2020        PMID: 31930520     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  3 in total

Review 1.  A guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild.

Authors:  Anne G Hertel; Petri T Niemelä; Niels J Dingemanse; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.600

2.  Favorable winds speed up bird migration in spring but not in autumn.

Authors:  Raphaël Nussbaumer; Baptiste Schmid; Silke Bauer; Felix Liechti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Individual repeatability of avian migration phenology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kirsty A Franklin; Malcolm A C Nicoll; Simon J Butler; Ken Norris; Norman Ratcliffe; Shinichi Nakagawa; Jennifer A Gill
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.606

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.