Literature DB >> 31930001

Distal pancreatectomy in the new era of minimally invasive surgery: the on-going debate on the cost-effectiveness.

Giuseppe Quero1,2, Claudio Fiorillo1, Sergio Alfieri1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID： 31930001      PMCID： PMC6943023          DOI： 10.21037/hbsn.2019.09.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN： 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?

Authors:  Joshua A Waters; David F Canal; Eric A Wiebke; Ryan P Dumas; Joal D Beane; Juan R Aguilar-Saavedra; Chad G Ball; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; Henry A Pitt; Keith D Lillemoe; C Max Schmidt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giovanni Butturini; Ugo Boggi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Luca Morelli; Fabio Vistoli; Isacco Damoli; Andrea Peri; Claudio Fiorillo; Luigi Pugliese; Marco Ramera; Nelide De Lio; Gregorio Di Franco; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Fausto Rosa; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giuseppe Quero
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Value-based assessment of robotic pancreas and liver surgery.

Authors:  James C Patti; Ana Sofia Ore; Courtney Barrows; Vic Velanovich; A James Moser
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Giovanni Butturini; Isacco Damoli; Lorenzo Crepaz; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Despoina Daskalaki; Alessandro Esposito; Sara Cingarlini; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Quero; Fausto Rosa; Riccardo Ricci; Claudio Fiorillo; Maria C Giustiniani; Caterina Cina; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni B Doglietto; Sergio Alfieri
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-03-13

7.  Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?

Authors:  Maylis Rodriguez; Riccardo Memeo; Piera Leon; Fabrizio Panaro; Stylianos Tzedakis; Ornella Perotto; Sharmini Varatharajah; Nicola de'Angelis; Pietro Riva; Didier Mutter; Francis Navarro; Jacques Marescaux; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.293
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas.

Authors:  Yabo Jiang; Kailian Zheng; Shichao Zhang; Zhuo Shao; Peng Cheng; Yijie Zhang; Gang Jin; Tianlin He
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.241
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.