| Literature DB >> 31929560 |
Tsai-Hsuan Tsai1,2,3,4, Wen-Yen Lin5,3, Yung-Sheng Chang6, Po-Cheng Chang7, Ming-Yih Lee3,8.
Abstract
With advances in technology, wireless and sensor technologies represent a method for continuously recording people's biomedical signals, which may enhance the diagnosis and treatment of users' everyday health conditions. These technologies mostly target older adults. In this study, we examine a smart clothing system targeting clinically high-risk patients, including older adults with cardiovascular disease (31 outpatients) and older adults in general (81 participants), to obtain an understanding of the patients' perception of using wearable healthcare technologies. Given that technology anxiety has been shown to affect users' resistance to using new technology and that perceived ubiquity is considered a characteristic of wearable devices and other mobile wireless technologies, we included three external variables: i.e., technology anxiety, perceived ubiquity, and resistance to change, in addition to the traditional components of the technology acceptance model (TAM). The results of the hypothesized model showed that among older adults in general, technology anxiety had a negative effect on the perceived ease of use and perceived ubiquity. The perceived ubiquity construct affects both user groups' perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of wearing smart clothes. Most relationships among the original constructs of the TAM were validated in older adults in general. Interestingly, we found that perceived usefulness had an indirect effect on behavioral intention through attitude. These results further confirm the validity of the extended TAM in determining older users' technology acceptance behavior.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31929560 PMCID: PMC6957166 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Technology acceptance model [23].
Fig 2The sensor positions (gray dots: ECG sensors; red dots: SCG sensors).
Fig 4Framework of the wearable instrumented vest.
Fig 3The wearable instrumented vest for males (left) and females (right).
Measures of the constructs.
| Variable | Items | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Technology anxiety | TA1 | I feel apprehensive about using the smart clothing system. |
| TA2 | I hesitate to use technology for fear of making mistakes that I cannot correct. | |
| TA3 | I am afraid that the equipment may suddenly stop functioning. | |
| TA4 | I do not want other people to see me wearing smart clothes. | |
| Perceived ubiquity | PB1 | A smart clothing system that provides healthcare information “anytime and anywhere” is crucial. |
| PB2 | The smart clothing system provides me with anytime-and-anywhere communication and connectivity. | |
| PB3 | I will use the smart clothing system very often for health purposes. | |
| Resistance to change | RC1 | I do not want the smart clothing system to change the way I deal with health-related problems. |
| RC2 | I do not want the smart clothing system to change the way I keep myself healthy. | |
| RC3 | I do not want the smart clothing system to change the way I interact with other people. | |
| RC4 | Overall, I do not want smart clothing to change the way I currently live. | |
| Perceived usefulness | PU1 | Using smart clothes will improve my life quality. |
| PU2 | Using the smart clothing system will make my life more convenient. | |
| PU3 | Using the smart clothing system will make me more effective in my life. | |
| PU4 | Overall, I find the smart clothing system to be useful in my life. | |
| Perceived | PEOU1 | I find the smart clothing system to be clear and understandable. |
| PEOU2 | I find that the smart clothing system does not require a lot of mental effort. | |
| PEOU3 | I find the smart clothing system to be easy to use. | |
| Attitude | AT1 | I think that using the smart clothing system is a good idea. |
| AT2 | I think that using the smart clothing system is beneficial to me. | |
| AT3 | I have a positive perception of using the smart clothing system. | |
| Behavioral intention | BI1 | I intend to use the smart clothing system in the future. |
| BI2 | I will always try to use the smart clothing system in my daily life. | |
| BI3 | I plan to use the smart clothing system frequently. |
Reliability and validity of the measurement model of older adults with cardiovascular disease.
| Variable | Item | Cronbach’s Alpha | Factor Loading | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA1 | .792 | 0.89 | 0.847 | 0.589 | ||
| TA2 | 0.89 | |||||
| TA3 | 0.67 | |||||
| TA4 | 0.57 | |||||
| PB1 | .917 | 0.96 | 0.953 | 0.835 | ||
| PB2 | 0.96 | |||||
| PB3 | 0.86 | |||||
| RC1 | .916 | 0.94 | 0.938 | 0.791 | ||
| RC2 | 0.94 | |||||
| RC3 | 0.91 | |||||
| RC4 | 0.75 | |||||
| PEOU1 | .692 | 0.79 | 0.817 | 0.598 | ||
| PEOU2 | 0.79 | |||||
| PEOU3 | 0.75 | |||||
| PU1 | .934 | 0.93 | 0.953 | 0.835 | ||
| PU2 | 0.92 | |||||
| PU3 | 0.88 | |||||
| PU4 | 0.93 | |||||
| AT1 | .839 | 0.83 | 0.904 | 0.758 | ||
| AT2 | 0.84 | |||||
| AT3 | 0.94 | |||||
| BI1 | .917 | 0.92 | 0.947 | 0.855 | ||
| BI2 | 0.96 | |||||
| BI3 | 0.89 |
The mean, standard deviation, and discriminant validity of the constructs of the model of older adults with cardiovascular disease.
| Mean | S.D. | BI | AT | PU | PEOU | RC | TA | PB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.66 | 0.92 | 0.925 | |||||||
| 4.11 | 0.79 | 0.433 | 0.871 | ||||||
| 3.93 | 0.84 | 0.193 | 0.698 | 0.914 | |||||
| 3.68 | 0.75 | 0.241 | 0.483 | 0.614 | 0.773 | ||||
| 3.17 | 1.28 | -0.553 | -0.348 | -0.286 | -0.243 | 0.889 | |||
| 2.39 | 1.05 | -0.211 | -0.448 | -0.503 | -0.403 | 0.208 | 0.767 | ||
| 3.88 | 0.90 | 0.428 | 0.582 | 0.708 | 0.665 | -0.451 | -0.297 | 0.927 |
Reliability and validity of the measurement model of older adults in general.
| Variable | Item | Cronbach’s Alpha | Factor Loading | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA1 | .718 | 0.88 | 0.813 | 0.528 | |
| TA2 | 0.94 | ||||
| TA3 | 0.82 | ||||
| TA4 | 0.85 | ||||
| PB1 | .853 | 0.88 | 0.910 | 0.771 | |
| PB2 | 0.88 | ||||
| PB3 | 0.87 | ||||
| RC1 | .902 | 0.88 | 0.928 | 0.765 | |
| RC2 | 0.94 | ||||
| RC3 | 0.82 | ||||
| RC4 | 0.85 | ||||
| PEOU1 | .717 | 0.78 | 0.839 | 0.635 | |
| PEOU2 | 0.79 | ||||
| PEOU3 | 0.82 | ||||
| PU1 | .937 | 0.92 | 0.955 | 0.840 | |
| PU2 | 0.91 | ||||
| PU3 | 0.93 | ||||
| PU4 | 0.91 | ||||
| AT1 | .886 | 0.90 | 0.929 | 0.815 | |
| AT2 | 0.88 | ||||
| AT3 | 0.93 | ||||
| BI1 | .934 | 0.92 | 0.958 | 0.883 | |
| BI2 | 0.96 | ||||
| BI3 | 0.93 |
The mean, standard deviation, and discriminant validity of the constructs of the model of older adults in general.
| Mean | S.D. | BI | AT | PU | PEOU | RC | TA | PB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.51 | 0.96 | 0.940 | |||||||
| 4.06 | 0.80 | 0.670 | 0.903 | ||||||
| 3.76 | 0.92 | 0.543 | 0.746 | 0.917 | |||||
| 3.83 | 0.80 | 0.590 | 0.629 | 0.613 | 0.797 | ||||
| 3.43 | 1.18 | -0.298 | -0.278 | -0.227 | -0.171 | 0.875 | |||
| 2.55 | 1.94 | -0.434 | -0.563 | -0.490 | -0.516 | 0.192 | 0.727 | ||
| 3.97 | 0.87 | 0.600 | 0.591 | 0.588 | 0.624 | -0.202 | -0.398 | 0.878 |
Summary of the hypothesis results.
| IV | → | DV | Standard Deviation | T-value | p-value | Support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | PU | 0.184 | 1.590 | No | |||
| TA | PU | 0.109 | 1.791 | No | |||
| TA | PEOU | 0.227 | 0.940 | No | |||
| TA | PEOU | 0.082 | 3.867 | Yes | |||
| TA | RC | 0.270 | 0.808 | No | |||
| TA | RC | 0.153 | 1.255 | No | |||
| TA | PB | 0.236 | 1.258 | No | |||
| TA | PB | 0.100 | 3.987 | Yes | |||
| RC | PU | 0.161 | 0.615 | No | |||
| RC | PU | 0.078 | 0.967 | No | |||
| RC | PEOU | 0.177 | 0.741 | No | |||
| RC | PEOU | 0.082 | 0.123 | No | |||
| PB | PU | 0.196 | 2.826 | Yes | |||
| PB | PU | 0.131 | 2.301 | Yes | |||
| PB | PEOU | 0.198 | 2.735 | Yes | |||
| PB | PEOU | 0.088 | 5.656 | Yes | |||
| PU | AT | 0.225 | 2.857 | Yes | |||
| PU | AT | 0.106 | 5.433 | Yes | |||
| PU | BI | 0.291 | 1.055 | No | |||
| PU | BI | 0.122 | 0.799 | No | |||
| PEOU | AT | 0.185 | 0.471 | No | |||
| PEOU | → | AT | 0.100 | 2.758 | Yes | ||
| PEOU | PU | 0.194 | 0.880 | No | |||
| PEOU | PU | 0.137 | 2.262 | Yes | |||
| AT | BI | 0.334 | 1.739 | No | |||
| AT | BI | 0.112 | 5.338 | Yes |
Note
* p < 0.05.
** p < 0.01.
*** p < 0.001.
Fig 5Path model of 31 older adults with cardiovascular disease.
Fig 6Path model of 81 older adults in general.