Literature DB >> 31928894

Mediation analysis for estimating cardioprotection of longitudinal RAS inhibition beyond lowering blood pressure and albuminuria in type 1 diabetes.

Jingchuan Guo1, Ashley I Naimi2, Maria M Brooks2, Matthew F Muldoon3, Trevor J Orchard2, Tina Costacou2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the extent of cardiovascular benefit of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition beyond lowering blood pressure (BP) and albuminuria in type 1 diabetes (T1D).
METHODS: This cohort study included 605 T1D participants from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications study without baseline coronary artery disease (CAD). Participant follow-up extended through 25 years. We implemented marginal structural models to estimate total effect of and controlled direct effect by isolating the role of BP or albuminuria in mediating the relation between RAS inhibitors and CAD.
RESULTS: Total effect of longitudinal RAS inhibition treatment was associated with 38% decreased CAD risk (HR [95% CI]: 0.62 [0.23, 1.77]). The controlled direct effect of RAS inhibition was a 27% risk reduction (HR: 0.73 [0.20, 2.59]) when isolating the role of BP and 26% risk reduction (HR: 0.74 [0.16, 3.35]) when isolating the role of albuminuria. The mediation proportion for each 10 mm Hg systolic BP and each 1 log unit of albumin excretion rate were 34% and 37%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that BP regulation and albuminuria reduction can only partially explain cardiovascular benefit of RAS inhibition on CAD in T1D, supporting the assertion that RAS inhibitors provide additional cardioprotection beyond lowering BP and albuminuria.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antihypertensive treatment; Coronary artery disease; Longitudinal study design; Mediation analysis; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31928894      PMCID: PMC7024023          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  40 in total

1.  A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Theis Lange; Stijn Vansteelandt; Maarten Bekaert
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Prevalence of complications in IDDM by sex and duration. Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study II.

Authors:  T J Orchard; J S Dorman; R E Maser; D J Becker; A L Drash; D Ellis; R E LaPorte; L H Kuller
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  A Contemporary Estimate of Total Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study.

Authors:  Rachel G Miller; Hemant D Mahajan; Tina Costacou; Akira Sekikawa; Stewart J Anderson; Trevor J Orchard
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 8.  Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Robert Fakheri; Bora Toklu; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-11

9.  Using time-varying models to estimate post-transplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Cindy L Bryce; Chung Chou H Chang; Yi Ren; Jonathan Yabes; Gabriel Zenarosa; Aditya Iyer; Heather Tomko; Robert H Squires; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry.

Authors:  Olawale F Ayilara; Lisa Zhang; Tolulope T Sajobi; Richard Sawatzky; Eric Bohm; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Discoveries from the study of longstanding type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Bruce A Perkins; Leif Erik Lovblom; Sebastien O Lanctôt; Krista Lamb; David Z I Cherney
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 10.122

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.