Literature DB >> 31928887

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics - Update 2019.

Claus Garbe1, Teresa Amaral2, Ketty Peris3, Axel Hauschild4, Petr Arenberger5, Lars Bastholt6, Veronique Bataille7, Veronique Del Marmol8, Brigitte Dréno9, Maria Concetta Fargnoli10, Jean-Jacques Grob11, Christoph Höller12, Roland Kaufmann13, Aimilios Lallas14, Celeste Lebbé15, Josep Malvehy16, Mark Middleton17, David Moreno-Ramirez18, Giovanni Pellacani19, Philippe Saiag20, Alexander J Stratigos21, Ricardo Vieira22, Iris Zalaudek23, Alexander M M Eggermont24.   

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and shall always be confirmed through dermatoscopy. If a melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is required. Sequential digital dermatoscopy and full-body photography can be used in risk persons to detect the development of melanomas at an earlier stage. Where available, confocal reflectance microscopy can improve clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma shall be classified according to the 8th version of the AJCC classification. Thin melanomas up to 0.8 mm tumor thickness does not require further imaging diagnostics. From stage IB onwards, examinations with lymph node sonography are recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIC whole-body examinations with CT or PET-CT in combination with brain MRI are recommended. From stage III and higher, mutation testing is recommended, particularly for BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to provide a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. There is no evidence to support the frequency and extent of examinations. A stage-based follow-up scheme is proposed, which, according to the experience of the guideline group, covers the minimum requirements; further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2021.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AJCC classification; Confocal reflectance microscopy; Cutaneous melanoma; Dermatoscopy; Follow-up examinations; Imaging diagnostics; Mutation testing; Primary diagnosis; Sequential digital dermatoscopy; Total body photography

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928887     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  34 in total

Review 1.  Skin Conditions and Movement Disorders: Hiding in Plain Sight.

Authors:  Kristina Kulcsarova; Janette Baloghova; Jan Necpal; Matej Skorvanek
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 2.  The different faces of metastatic melanoma in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Eva Mendes Serrao; Ana Maria Costa; Sergio Ferreira; Victoria McMorran; Emma Cargill; Caroline Hough; Ashley S Shaw; Brent O'Carrigan; Christine A Parkinson; Pippa G Corrie; Timothy J Sadler
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-10-04

3.  A novel 7 RNA-based signature for prediction of prognosis and therapeutic responses of wild-type BRAF cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Ruizheng Sun; Yaozhong Liu; Cheng Lei; Zhenwei Tang; Lixia Lu
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 7.717

Review 4.  Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus.

Authors:  Begoña Campos-Balea; Ovidio Fernández-Calvo; Roberto García-Figueiras; Carlos Neira; Carmen Peña-Penabad; Carmela Rodríguez-López; Rocío Vílchez-Simo; María Quindós-Varela
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.340

5.  Surgery vs non-surgery in cutaneous melanoma based on SEER database: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yingnan Liu; Dazhi Yang; Xiaokuan Fu; Yulong Sun; Hongtao Xiong; Xichi Fang; Yongqing Zhuang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma - a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandra Hendrickx; Antonio Cozzio; Ludwig Plasswilm; Cédric M Panje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Metastatic melanoma treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in the COVID-19 era: experience from an Italian Skin Cancer Unit.

Authors:  P Quaglino; P Fava; M Brizio; E Marra; M Rubatto; A Agostini; L Tonella; S Ribero; M T Fierro
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Development and validation of prognostic nomogram in patients with nonmetastatic malignant melanoma: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Yu Xiao; Shanshan Peng; Youhong Hu; Jie Zhang; Xianwei Cao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Malignancy Rate of Indeterminate Findings on FDG-PET/CT in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ken Kudura; Florentia Dimitriou; Daniela Mihic-Probst; Urs J Muehlematter; Tim Kutzker; Lucas Basler; Robert Förster; Reinhard Dummer; Joanna Mangana; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Michael Christoph Kreissl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15

10.  The Great Debate at "Melanoma Bridge", Naples, December 7th, 2019.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Alexander Eggermont; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jean-Jacques Grob; Omid Hamid; Olivier Michielin; Michael Postow; Igor Puzanov; Hassane M Zarour; Corrado Caracò; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.