Literature DB >> 31928272

Relative potency factor approach enables the use of in vitro information for estimation of human effect factors for nanoparticle toxicity in life-cycle impact assessment.

Beatrice Salieri1, Jean-Pierre Kaiser2, Matthias Rösslein2, Bernd Nowack1, Roland Hischier1, Peter Wick2.   

Abstract

The major theme of the NRC report "Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century" is to replace animal testing by using alternative in vitro methods. Therefore, it can be expected that in the future in vivo data will be replaced with in vitro data. Hence, there is a need for new strategies to make use of the increasing amount of in vitro data when developing human toxicological effect factors (HEF) to characterize the impact category of human toxicity in life cycle assessment (LCA). Here, we present a new approach for deriving HEF for manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) based on the combined use of in vitro toxicity data and a relative potency factor (RPF) approach. In vitro toxicity tests with nano-CuO, nano-Ag and nano-ZnO and their corresponding ions were performed on THP-1, CaCo-2 and Hep-G2 cell lines. The ratio of the here calculated EC50 of the ionic form and the nanoform corresponds to the Relative Potency Factor (RPF). Using this approach, HEFs (case/kgintake) for the aforementioned nanoparticles were obtained. Non-carcinogenic HEFs (case/kgintake) for exposure via ingestion of 5.9E-01, 7.5E-03 and 2.5 E-02 were calculated for nano-Ag, nano-CuO and nano-ZnO, respectively. The HEF values here proposed were compared with HEF values extrapolated from in vivo toxicity data reported in the literature. The here presented procedure is the most appropriate approximation currently available for using in vitro toxicity data on MNM for application in the field of LCIA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro toxicity test; human effect factor; life-cycle impact assessment; manufactured nanomaterials; relative potency factor approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928272     DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2019.1710872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  4 in total

Review 1.  Nanosafety: An Evolving Concept to Bring the Safest Possible Nanomaterials to Society and Environment.

Authors:  Filipa Lebre; Nivedita Chatterjee; Samantha Costa; Eli Fernández-de-Gortari; Carla Lopes; João Meneses; Luís Ortiz; Ana R Ribeiro; Vânia Vilas-Boas; Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  U.S. Federal Agency interests and key considerations for new approach methodologies for nanomaterials.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Patricia Ceger; David G Allen; Jayme Coyle; Raymond Derk; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; John Gordon; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Joanna Matheson; Danielle McShan; Bryant C Nelson; Anil K Patri; Penelope Rice; Liying Rojanasakul; Abhilash Sasidharan; Louis Scarano; Xiaoqing Chang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 3.  A Content Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Nanomaterials: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Nurul Umairah M Nizam; Marlia M Hanafiah; Kok Sin Woon
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO2 , and Nano-ZnO) in European Freshwaters.

Authors:  Hyunjoo Hong; Véronique Adam; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.