Background and purpose: The optimal treatment for acute ischemic stroke with mild neurologic deficits is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of alteplase versus dual-antiplatelet therapy in acute minor stroke. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with minor ischemic stroke and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ≤5 presenting within 24 h from last seen normal. Patients were divided into intravenous alteplase or dual-antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included mRS score at 7 days, and composite outcome of vascular events within 90 days. The safety outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) according to the ECASS II criteria. Clinical outcomes were compared using a multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. We then performed the propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Two hundred twenty-eight patients met the eligibility criteria were included for analysis between January 2015 and September 2018. In the aspirin-clopidogrel group, 109 patients (91.6%) achieved a favorable functional outcome at 3-month versus 85(78.0%) in the alteplase group (OR 4.463, 95%CI 1.708-11.662, p = .002). The difference of the composite outcome of vascular events were not statistical significance between the two groups (p > .05). Asymptomatic ICH occurred in 0.8% patients who received aspirin-clopidogrel, as compared with 3.7% patients in alteplase group (p = .030).Conclusions: Patients treated with dual-antiplatelet therapy with acute minor ischemic stroke had greater functional outcome at 3 months compared with patients who received alteplase therapy.Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that dual-antiplatelet therapy is superior to alteplase for achieving a better functional outcome and does not increase the risk of hemorrhage in acute minor ischemic stroke.
Background and purpose: The optimal treatment for acute ischemic stroke with mild neurologic deficits is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of alteplase versus dual-antiplatelet therapy in acute minor stroke. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with minor ischemic stroke and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ≤5 presenting within 24 h from last seen normal. Patients were divided into intravenous alteplase or dual-antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included mRS score at 7 days, and composite outcome of vascular events within 90 days. The safety outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) according to the ECASS II criteria. Clinical outcomes were compared using a multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. We then performed the propensity score matching as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Two hundred twenty-eight patients met the eligibility criteria were included for analysis between January 2015 and September 2018. In the aspirin-clopidogrel group, 109 patients (91.6%) achieved a favorable functional outcome at 3-month versus 85(78.0%) in the alteplase group (OR 4.463, 95%CI 1.708-11.662, p = .002). The difference of the composite outcome of vascular events were not statistical significance between the two groups (p > .05). Asymptomatic ICH occurred in 0.8% patients who received aspirin-clopidogrel, as compared with 3.7% patients in alteplase group (p = .030).Conclusions: Patients treated with dual-antiplatelet therapy with acute minor ischemic stroke had greater functional outcome at 3 months compared with patients who received alteplase therapy.Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that dual-antiplatelet therapy is superior to alteplase for achieving a better functional outcome and does not increase the risk of hemorrhage in acute minor ischemic stroke.
Entities:
Keywords:
Minor stroke; alteplase; aspirin; clopidogrel