Literature DB >> 31928094

Indirect methods of comparison of the safety of ferric derisomaltose, iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia.

Richard F Pollock1, Patrick Biggar2.   

Abstract

Objectives: The benefits of intravenous (IV) iron greatly outweigh the risks, but IV iron formulations carry a small risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The objective was to use standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities queries (SMQs) to compare the safety of ferric derisomaltose/iron isomaltoside 1000 (FDI), iron sucrose (IS), and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) using prospective trial data.
Methods: Prospective trials reporting the incidence of SMQ-coded serious or severe HSRs were identified in the literature. Four SMQs were used: narrow hypersensitivity terms (A), and broad terms pertaining to potential respiratory HSRs (B), skin HSRs (C), and cardiovascular HSRs (D). Bayesian inference, naïve pooling, and adjusted indirect approaches were employed to compare HSR incidence.
Results: Twenty one prospective trials including over 8,000 patients receiving FDI, FCM or IS were retrieved. Odds ratios of any serious or severe HSR (all groups) with FDI relative to FCM were 0.41, 0.39, and 0.45 according to the Bayesian, naïve and adjusted approaches, respectively.Conclusions: The risk of serious or severe HSRs was lower with FDI relative to FCM and IS. Using data from prospective trials including over 8,000 patients coded using a well-defined standard (SMQs) enabled a robust comparison of HSR incidence between the iron formulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administration; Ferric derisomaltose; Intravenous; Iron; Iron deficiency anemia; Iron isomaltoside

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928094     DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1709437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol        ISSN: 1747-4094            Impact factor:   2.929


  6 in total

1.  An Economic Analysis of Ferric Derisomaltose versus Ferric Carboxymaltose in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Norway, Sweden, and Finland.

Authors:  Richard F Pollock; Gorden Muduma
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 2.  Clinical data for intravenous iron - debunking the hype around hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Maureen Achebe; Thomas G DeLoughery
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  A 6 month extension trial evaluating safety and efficacy of ferric derisomaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia: The FERWON-EXT trial.

Authors:  Maureen M Achebe; John Glaspy; Philip A Kalra; Michael Auerbach; Lars L Thomsen; Sunil Bhandari
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Efficacy and safety of ferric derisomaltose (FDI) compared with iron sucrose (IS) in patients with iron deficiency anemia after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Michael Auerbach; Maureen M Achebe; Lars L Thomsen; Richard J Derman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Indirect Comparison of Blindly Adjudicated Cardiovascular Event Incidence with Ferric Derisomaltose, Ferric Carboxymaltose, and Iron Sucrose.

Authors:  Richard F Pollock; Philip A Kalra; Paul R Kalra; Fozia Z Ahmed
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.070

6.  Intravenous iron isomaltoside versus oral iron supplementation for treatment of iron deficiency in pregnancy: protocol for a randomised, comparative, open-label trial.

Authors:  Veronika Markova; Rebecka Hansen; Lars Lykke Thomsen; Anja Pinborg; Torben Moos; Charlotte Holm
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.