Samson Ghilu1, Qilin Li1, Shaun D Fontaine2, Daniel V Santi2, Raushan T Kurmasheva1, Siyuan Zheng1, Peter J Houghton3. 1. Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health San Antonio, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. 2. ProLynx LLC, 455 Mission Bay Blvd, South San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. 3. Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, UT Health San Antonio, 8403 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. HoughtonP@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. METHODS: Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as 'extreme responders' to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as 'resistant'. RESULTS: The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (r2 = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (r2 = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53, or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.
PURPOSE: Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. METHODS: Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as 'extreme responders' to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as 'resistant'. RESULTS: The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (r2 = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (r2 = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53, or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alternative experimental design; Drug evaluation; Genetic diversity; Pediatric cancer; Response criteria; Single mouse study
Authors: Brendan Murphy; Han Yin; John M Maris; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; Stephen T Keir; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Igor Dvorchik; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Nana Boateng; Malcolm A Smith; Richard B Lock; Peter J Houghton Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Peter J Houghton; Christopher L Morton; Chandra Tucker; Debbie Payne; Edward Favours; Claire Cole; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Wendong Zhang; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Mimi Tajbakhsh; C Patrick Reynolds; John M Maris; Joshua Courtright; Stephen T Keir; Henry S Friedman; Charles Stopford; Joseph Zeidner; Jianrong Wu; Tiebin Liu; Catherine A Billups; Javed Khan; Sherry Ansher; Jian Zhang; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: André Oberthuer; Dilafruz Juraeva; Barbara Hero; Ruth Volland; Carolina Sterz; Rene Schmidt; Andreas Faldum; Yvonne Kahlert; Anne Engesser; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Robert Seeger; Miki Ohira; Akira Nakagawara; Paola Scaruffi; Gian Paolo Tonini; Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey; Olivier Delattre; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Jo Vandesompele; Frank Speleman; Rosa Noguera; Marta Piqueras; Jean Bénard; Alexander Valent; Smadar Avigad; Isaac Yaniv; Richard G Grundy; Monika Ortmann; Chunxuan Shao; Manfred Schwab; Roland Eils; Thorsten Simon; Jessica Theissen; Frank Berthold; Frank Westermann; Benedikt Brors; Matthias Fischer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kristian W Pajtler; Hendrik Witt; Martin Sill; David T W Jones; Volker Hovestadt; Fabian Kratochwil; Khalida Wani; Ruth Tatevossian; Chandanamali Punchihewa; Pascal Johann; Jüri Reimand; Hans-Jörg Warnatz; Marina Ryzhova; Steve Mack; Vijay Ramaswamy; David Capper; Leonille Schweizer; Laura Sieber; Andrea Wittmann; Zhiqin Huang; Peter van Sluis; Richard Volckmann; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Daniel Fults; Helen Toledano; Smadar Avigad; Lindsey M Hoffman; Andrew M Donson; Nicholas Foreman; Ekkehard Hewer; Karel Zitterbart; Mark Gilbert; Terri S Armstrong; Nalin Gupta; Jeffrey C Allen; Matthias A Karajannis; David Zagzag; Martin Hasselblatt; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; V Peter Collins; Katja von Hoff; Stefan Rutkowski; Torsten Pietsch; Gary Bader; Marie-Laure Yaspo; Andreas von Deimling; Peter Lichter; Michael D Taylor; Richard Gilbertson; David W Ellison; Kenneth Aldape; Andrey Korshunov; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: André Oberthuer; Barbara Hero; Frank Berthold; Dilafruz Juraeva; Andreas Faldum; Yvonne Kahlert; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Robert Seeger; Paola Scaruffi; Gian Paolo Tonini; Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey; Olivier Delattre; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Jo Vandesompele; Joëlle Vermeulen; Frank Speleman; Rosa Noguera; Marta Piqueras; Jean Bénard; Alexander Valent; Smadar Avigad; Isaac Yaniv; Axel Weber; Holger Christiansen; Richard G Grundy; Katharina Schardt; Manfred Schwab; Roland Eils; Patrick Warnat; Lars Kaderali; Thorsten Simon; Boris Decarolis; Jessica Theissen; Frank Westermann; Benedikt Brors; Matthias Fischer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jack F Shern; Li Chen; Juliann Chmielecki; Jun S Wei; Rajesh Patidar; Mara Rosenberg; Lauren Ambrogio; Daniel Auclair; Jianjun Wang; Young K Song; Catherine Tolman; Laura Hurd; Hongling Liao; Shile Zhang; Dominik Bogen; Andrew S Brohl; Sivasish Sindiri; Daniel Catchpoole; Thomas Badgett; Gad Getz; Jaume Mora; James R Anderson; Stephen X Skapek; Frederic G Barr; Matthew Meyerson; Douglas S Hawkins; Javed Khan Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Marcel Kool; Andrey Korshunov; Marc Remke; David T W Jones; Maria Schlanstein; Paul A Northcott; Yoon-Jae Cho; Jan Koster; Antoinette Schouten-van Meeteren; Dannis van Vuurden; Steven C Clifford; Torsten Pietsch; Andre O von Bueren; Stefan Rutkowski; Martin McCabe; V Peter Collins; Magnus L Bäcklund; Christine Haberler; Franck Bourdeaut; Olivier Delattre; Francois Doz; David W Ellison; Richard J Gilbertson; Scott L Pomeroy; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Andrew S Brohl; David A Solomon; Wendy Chang; Jianjun Wang; Young Song; Sivasish Sindiri; Rajesh Patidar; Laura Hurd; Li Chen; Jack F Shern; Hongling Liao; Xinyu Wen; Julia Gerard; Jung-Sik Kim; Jose Antonio Lopez Guerrero; Isidro Machado; Daniel H Wai; Piero Picci; Timothy Triche; Andrew E Horvai; Markku Miettinen; Jun S Wei; Daniel Catchpool; Antonio Llombart-Bosch; Todd Waldman; Javed Khan Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Mitchell E Horwitz; Stephen Wease; Beth Blackwell; David Valcarcel; Francesco Frassoni; Jaap Jan Boelens; Stefan Nierkens; Madan Jagasia; John E Wagner; Jurgen Kuball; Liang Piu Koh; Navneet S Majhail; Patrick J Stiff; Rabi Hanna; William Y K Hwang; Joanne Kurtzberg; Daniela Cilloni; Laurence S Freedman; Pau Montesinos; Guillermo Sanz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Holly L Pacenta; Wendy Allen-Rhoades; David Langenau; Peter J Houghton; Charles Keller; Christine M Heske; Michael D Deel; Corinne M Linardic; Jack F Shern; Elizabeth Stewart; Brian Turpin; Douglas J Harrison; Javed Khan; Leo Mascarenhas; Stephen X Skapek; William H Meyer; Douglas S Hawkins; Eleanor Y Chen; James F Amatruda; Pooja Hingorani; Theodore W Laetsch Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Vanessa Del Pozo; Andrew J Robles; Shaun D Fontaine; Qianqian Liu; Joel E Michalek; Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva Journal: iScience Date: 2021-12-31
Authors: Samson Ghilu; Christopher L Morton; Angelina V Vaseva; Siyuan Zheng; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton Journal: Cancer Drug Resist Date: 2022-01-04
Authors: Nathan M Kendsersky; Jarrett Lindsay; E Anders Kolb; Malcolm A Smith; Beverly A Teicher; Stephen W Erickson; Eric J Earley; Yael P Mosse; Daniel Martinez; Jennifer Pogoriler; Kateryna Krytska; Khushbu Patel; David Groff; Matthew Tsang; Samson Ghilu; Yifei Wang; Steven Seaman; Yang Feng; Brad St Croix; Richard Gorlick; Raushan Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; John M Maris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gabriele Manzella; Leonie D Schreck; Willemijn B Breunis; Jan Molenaar; Hans Merks; Frederic G Barr; Wenyue Sun; Michaela Römmele; Luduo Zhang; Joelle Tchinda; Quy A Ngo; Peter Bode; Olivier Delattre; Didier Surdez; Bharat Rekhi; Felix K Niggli; Beat W Schäfer; Marco Wachtel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 14.919