Literature DB >> 31927582

Brexit is just a symptom: the constitutional weaknesses it reveals have serious consequences for health.

Holly Jarman1, Scott L Greer2, Martin McKee3.   

Abstract

Brexit has direct and indirect negative health consequences, whether from economic damage or from the political paralysis and distraction from public health that it has created. Brexit is a public health problem in its own right, as other literature has shown-but, we argue, it is also a symptom of deeper problems in the governance of the United Kingdom. In particular, the combination of executive dominance, partisanship and opacity that give rise to the constitutional casualism of the Brexit decisions has already affected public health policy and will continue to do so unless addressed.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brexit; United Kingdom; constitution; health; politics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31927582     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  2 in total

Review 1.  Open science communication: The first year of the UK's Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies.

Authors:  Martin McKee; Danny Altmann; Anthony Costello; Karl Friston; Zubaida Haque; Kamlesh Khunti; Susan Michie; Tolullah Oni; Christina Pagel; Deenan Pillay; Steve Reicher; Helen Salisbury; Gabriel Scally; Kit Yates; Linda Bauld; Laura Bear; John Drury; Melissa Parker; Ann Phoenix; Elizabeth Stokoe; Robert West
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.255

Review 2.  Reforming the public health system in England.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Peter Littlejohns; Albert Weale
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2022-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.