Literature DB >> 31927397

Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives.

Maëlig Jacquet1, Christophe Champod2.   

Abstract

With recent technological innovations, the multiplication of captured images of criminal events has brought the comparison of faces to the forefront of the judicial scene. Forensic face recognition has become a ubiquitous tool to guide investigations, gather intelligence and provide evidence in court. However, its reliability in court still suffers from the lack of methodological standardization and empirical validation, notably when using automatic systems, which compare images and generate a matching score. Although the use of such systems increases drastically, it still requires more empirical studies based on adequate forensic data (surveillance footage and identity documents) to become a reliable method to present evidence in court. In this paper, we propose a review of the literature leading to the establishment of a methodological workflow to develop a score-based likelihood-ratio computation model using a Bayesian framework. Different approaches are proposed in the literature regarding the within-source and between-sources variability distributions modelling. Depending on the data available, the modelling approach can be specific to the case or generic. Generic approaches allow interpreting the score without any available images of the suspect. Such model is henceforth harder to defend in court because the results are not anchored to the suspect. To make sure the computed score-based LR is robust, we must assess the performance of the model with two main characteristics: the discriminating power and the calibration state of the model. We hence describe the main metrics (Equal Error Rate and Cost of log likelihood-ratio), and graphical representations (Tippett plots, Detection Error Trade-off plot and Empirical Cross-Entropy plot) used to quantify and visualize the performance characteristics.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biometric system; Calibration; Facial comparison; Likelihood ratio; Score

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31927397     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

1.  Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system.

Authors:  Soren Blau; Jeremy Graham; Lyndall Smythe; Samantha Rowbotham
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  In search of a Goldilocks zone for credible AI.

Authors:  Kevin Allan; Nir Oren; Jacqui Hutchison; Douglas Martin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Face Recognition by Humans and Machines: Three Fundamental Advances from Deep Learning.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; Carlos D Castillo
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.745

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.