| Literature DB >> 31927087 |
Vanessa Smith1, Ariane L Herrick2, Francesca Ingegnoli3, Nemanja Damjanov4, Rossella De Angelis5, Christopher P Denton6, Oliver Distler7, Karinna Espejo8, Ivan Foeldvari9, Tracy Frech10, Boris Garro11, Marwin Gutierrez12, Genevieve Gyger13, Eric Hachulla14, Roger Hesselstrand15, Annamaria Iagnocco16, Cristiane Kayser17, Karin Melsens18, Ulf Müller-Ladner19, Sabrina Paolino20, Carmen Pizzorni21, Mislav Radic22, Valeria Riccieri23, Marcus Snow24, Wendy Stevens25, Alberto Sulli26, Jacob M van Laar27, Madelon C Vonk28, Amber Vanhaecke29, Maurizio Cutolo30.
Abstract
Capillaroscopy is a non-invasive and safe tool which allows the evaluation of the morphology of the microcirculation. Since its recent incorporation in the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis together with its assessed role to monitor disease progression, capillaroscopy became a 'mainstream' investigation for rheumatologists. Given its increasing use by a variety of physicians internationally both in daily practice to differentiate primary from secondary Raynaud's phenomenon, as well as in research context to predict disease progression and monitor treatment effects, standardisation in capillaroscopic image acquisition and analysis seems paramount. To step forward to this need, experts in the field of capillaroscopy/microcirculation provide in this very consensus paper their view on image acquisition and analysis, different capillaroscopic techniques, normal and abnormal capillaroscopic characteristics and their meaning, scoring systems and reliability of image acquisition and interpretation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31927087 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Autoimmun Rev ISSN: 1568-9972 Impact factor: 9.754