Brooks V Udelsman1, Edward T Moseley2, Rebecca L Sudore3, Nancy L Keating4, Charlotta Lindvall5. 1. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. Electronic address: budelsman@partners.org. 2. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA. 3. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. 5. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Documentation of care preferences within 48 hours of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is a National Quality Forum-endorsed quality metric for older adults. Care preferences are poorly captured by administrative data. OBJECTIVES: Using deep natural language processing, our aim was to determine the rate of care preference documentation in free-text notes and to assess associated patient factors. METHODS: Retrospective review of notes by clinicians using a deep natural language processing to identify care preference documentation, including goals-of-care and treatment limitations, within 48 hours of ICU admission within five ICUs (medical, cardiac, surgery, trauma surgery, and cardiac surgery) for adults 75 years and older. Covariates included demographics, ICU type, sequential organ failure assessment score, and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Deep natural language processing reviewed 11,575 clinician notes for 1350 ICU admissions. Median patient age was 84.0 years (interquartile range 78.0-88.4). Overall, 64.7% had documentation of care preferences. Patients with documentation were older (85 vs. 83 years; P < 0.001) and more often female (53.8% vs. 43.4%; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, rates of care preference documentation were higher for older patients, females, nonelective admissions, and admissions to the medical vs. the cardiac or surgical ICUs (all P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Care preference documentation within 48 hours was absent in more than one-third of ICU admissions among patients aged 75 years and older and was more likely to occur in medical vs. cardiac or surgical ICUs.
CONTEXT: Documentation of care preferences within 48 hours of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is a National Quality Forum-endorsed quality metric for older adults. Care preferences are poorly captured by administrative data. OBJECTIVES: Using deep natural language processing, our aim was to determine the rate of care preference documentation in free-text notes and to assess associated patient factors. METHODS: Retrospective review of notes by clinicians using a deep natural language processing to identify care preference documentation, including goals-of-care and treatment limitations, within 48 hours of ICU admission within five ICUs (medical, cardiac, surgery, trauma surgery, and cardiac surgery) for adults 75 years and older. Covariates included demographics, ICU type, sequential organ failure assessment score, and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Deep natural language processing reviewed 11,575 clinician notes for 1350 ICU admissions. Median patient age was 84.0 years (interquartile range 78.0-88.4). Overall, 64.7% had documentation of care preferences. Patients with documentation were older (85 vs. 83 years; P < 0.001) and more often female (53.8% vs. 43.4%; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, rates of care preference documentation were higher for older patients, females, nonelective admissions, and admissions to the medical vs. the cardiac or surgical ICUs (all P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Care preference documentation within 48 hours was absent in more than one-third of ICU admissions among patients aged 75 years and older and was more likely to occur in medical vs. cardiac or surgical ICUs.
Authors: Jill M Steiner; Christina Morse; Robert Y Lee; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Charlotta Lindvall; Chih-Ying Deng; Nicole D Agaronnik; Anne Kwok; Soujanya Samineni; Renato Umeton; Warren Mackie-Jenkins; Kenneth L Kehl; James A Tulsky; Andrea C Enzinger Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-06
Authors: Tamryn F Gray; Anne Kwok; Khuyen M Do; Sandra Zeng; Edward T Moseley; Yasser M Dbeis; Renato Umeton; James A Tulsky; Areej El-Jawahri; Charlotta Lindvall Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Alison M Uyeda; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Lyndia C Brumback; Yue Guo; James Sibley; William B Lober; Trevor Cohen; Janaki Torrence; Joanna Heywood; Sudiptho R Paul; Erin K Kross; Robert Y Lee Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 5.576