Laurie E Davies1, Gemma Spiers2, Andrew Kingston2, Adam Todd3, Joy Adamson2, Barbara Hanratty2. 1. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. Electronic address: L.E.Davies2@newcastle.ac.uk. 2. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 3. School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Polypharmacy is widespread among older people, but the adverse outcomes associated with it are unclear. We aim to synthesize current evidence on the adverse health, social, medicines management, and health care utilization outcomes of polypharmacy in older people. DESIGN: A systematic review, of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies, was conducted. Eleven bibliographic databases were searched from 1990 to February 2018. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Older people in any health care setting, residential setting, or country. RESULTS: Twenty-six reviews reporting on 230 unique studies were included. Almost all reviews operationalized polypharmacy as medication count, and few examined medication classes or disease states within this. Evidence for an association between polypharmacy and many adverse outcomes, including adverse drug events and disability, was conflicting. The most consistent evidence was found for hospitalization and inappropriate prescribing. No research had explored polypharmacy in the very old (aged ≥85 years), or examined the potential social consequences associated with medication use, such as loneliness and isolation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The literature examining the adverse outcomes of polypharmacy in older people is complex, extensive, and conflicting. Until polypharmacy is operationalized in a more clinically relevant manner, the adverse outcomes associated with it will not be fully understood. Future studies should work toward this approach in the face of rising multimorbidity and population aging.
OBJECTIVE: Polypharmacy is widespread among older people, but the adverse outcomes associated with it are unclear. We aim to synthesize current evidence on the adverse health, social, medicines management, and health care utilization outcomes of polypharmacy in older people. DESIGN: A systematic review, of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies, was conducted. Eleven bibliographic databases were searched from 1990 to February 2018. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Older people in any health care setting, residential setting, or country. RESULTS: Twenty-six reviews reporting on 230 unique studies were included. Almost all reviews operationalized polypharmacy as medication count, and few examined medication classes or disease states within this. Evidence for an association between polypharmacy and many adverse outcomes, including adverse drug events and disability, was conflicting. The most consistent evidence was found for hospitalization and inappropriate prescribing. No research had explored polypharmacy in the very old (aged ≥85 years), or examined the potential social consequences associated with medication use, such as loneliness and isolation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The literature examining the adverse outcomes of polypharmacy in older people is complex, extensive, and conflicting. Until polypharmacy is operationalized in a more clinically relevant manner, the adverse outcomes associated with it will not be fully understood. Future studies should work toward this approach in the face of rising multimorbidity and population aging.
Authors: Andrea C Betts; Caitlin C Murphy; L Aubree Shay; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Christine Markham; Marlyn Allicock Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Holly Q Bennett; Andrew Kingston; Ilianna Lourida; Louise Robinson; Lynne Corner; Carol Eg Brayne; Fiona E Matthews; Carol Jagger Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-07-31
Authors: Akshaya S Bhagavathula; Kota Vidyasagar; Manik Chhabra; Muhammed Rashid; Rishabh Sharma; Deepak K Bandari; Daniela Fialova Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Ikechi G Okpechi; Mohammed M Tinwala; Shezel Muneer; Deenaz Zaidi; Feng Ye; Laura N Hamonic; Maryam Khan; Naima Sultana; Scott Brimble; Allan Grill; Scott Klarenbach; Cliff Lindeman; Amber Molnar; Dorothea Nitsch; Paul Ronksley; Soroush Shojai; Boglarka Soos; Navdeep Tangri; Stephanie Thompson; Delphine Tuot; Neil Drummond; Dee Mangin; Aminu K Bello Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-07-04