Literature DB >> 31926795

A new viewpoint on endoscopic CABG: technique description and clinical experience.

Alaaddin Yilmaz1, Boris Robic1, Pascal Starinieri1, Frederic Polus2, Rudi Stinkens3, Björn Stessel4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to describe a newly developed endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (Endo-CABG) technique to treat patients with single- and multi-vessel disease and discuss the short-term clinical results in a large patient cohort. This technique avoids a median sternotomy by combining a thoracoscopic technique via three ∼5 mm thoracic ports and a mini-thoracotomy utility 3-4 cm port through the intercostal space.
METHODS: From January 2016 to January 2018, data from consecutive patients undergoing an elective Endo-CABG were prospectively entered into a customized database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients scheduled for a combined hybrid intervention were excluded. Conversion rate to sternotomy, incidence of surgical revision and postoperative graft failure, one-month survival, morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) were investigated. Subgroup analyses were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 342 patients undergoing an Endo-CABG with one (n = 53) or multiple (n = 289) bypasses were included. No conversion to sternotomy occurred and incidence of surgical revision, graft failure, and 30-day mortality was 7.3%, 1.5%, and 1.8%, respectively. Adverse neurological outcomes were rare: cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, epilepsy, and postoperative delirium were observed in 0.6%, 0.3%, 0.3%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively. Median intensive care unit and hospital LOS were 2.75 (IQR 1.8 to 3.8) and 8.0 days (IQR 7.0 to 10.0), respectively. Thirty-day mortality in obese patients, diabetics, and octogenarians was 0%, 3.6%, and 5.6%, respectively. EuroSCORE II > 5% was associated with a high 30-day mortality (25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Endo-CABG can be considered a safe and effective procedure to treat single- and multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Individual patient selection seems not necessary to apply this technique.
Copyright © 2020 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary artery disease; Minimally invasive surgery; Video-assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31926795     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  90-Day Patient-Centered Outcomes after Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jade Claessens; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Toon Mostien; Silke Van Genechten; Marithé Claes; Loren Packlé; Maud Pierson; Jeroen Vandenbrande; Abdullah Kaya; Björn Stessel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  From less invasive to minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation.

Authors:  Kyriakos Anastasiadis; Polychronis Antonitsis; Apostolos Deliopoulos; Helena Argiriadou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Neurological outcome after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (NOMICS): An observational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Björn Stessel; Kristof Nijs; Caroline Pelckmans; Jeroen Vandenbrande; Jean-Paul Ory; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Pascal Starinieri; Michiel Van Tornout; Nina De Klippel; Paul Dendale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical results after hybrid coronary revascularization with totally endoscopic coronary surgery.

Authors:  Jade Claessens; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Camille Awouters; Hanne Oosterbos; Stef Thonnisen; Edouard Benit; Abdullah Kaya; Yoann Bataille
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.522

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.