Kathleen E Simpson1, James K Kirklin2, Ryan S Cantor3, Mary Mehegan4, Jacqueline M Lamour5, Kristine J Guleserian6, David M Peng7, Elfriede Pahl8. 1. St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: simpson_k@kids.wustl.edu. 2. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery. 3. Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 4. St Louis Children's Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 5. Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York. 6. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Herbert Wertheim School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 7. C S Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 8. Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of ventricular assist device (VAD) in children has increased, but the decision of left VAD (LVAD) vs biventricular support remains a challenge. Children who undergo LVAD placement are at risk for right ventricular failure (RHF), but the incidence has not been described. METHODS: Analysis was performed for patients <18 years old who underwent durable LVAD placement within the Pedimacs registry (September 19, 2012-February 28, 2017), excluding single ventricle morphology and temporary devices. RHF was defined as the need for right ventriculalr assist device (RVAD) or prolonged inotrope use between 1 week to 1 month and 1 to 3 months. End-points included death, heart transplant (HT), and recovery. RESULTS: A total of 272 durable LVAD were placed of which 37 died on device over 24 month follow-up, primarily from multiorgan failure and neurologic dysfunction. RVAD occurred in 12 children at median 8.5 days, with 9 undergoing HT and 3 dying on device. In patients with only LVAD, RHF was present in 111/207 (55%) between 1 week to 1 month and 28/116 (25%) between 1 and 3 months. Younger age, smaller weight, Intermacs profile 1, chemical paralysis, and pulsatile flow VAD were associated with RHF. RHF was associated with increased risk of death on device at both >1 month (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.7, p = 0.007) and >3 month (hazard ratio 6.9, 95% CI 2-23.1, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In children, RHF is common after durable LVAD implantation, but subsequent RVAD is relatively rare. RHF in children, as indicated by prolonged inotrope support, was associated with an increased risk of death on the device. Whether early RVAD support and higher waitlist status may improve the outcome remains unknown.
BACKGROUND: The use of ventricular assist device (VAD) in children has increased, but the decision of left VAD (LVAD) vs biventricular support remains a challenge. Children who undergo LVAD placement are at risk for right ventricular failure (RHF), but the incidence has not been described. METHODS: Analysis was performed for patients <18 years old who underwent durable LVAD placement within the Pedimacs registry (September 19, 2012-February 28, 2017), excluding single ventricle morphology and temporary devices. RHF was defined as the need for right ventriculalr assist device (RVAD) or prolonged inotrope use between 1 week to 1 month and 1 to 3 months. End-points included death, heart transplant (HT), and recovery. RESULTS: A total of 272 durable LVAD were placed of which 37 died on device over 24 month follow-up, primarily from multiorgan failure and neurologic dysfunction. RVAD occurred in 12 children at median 8.5 days, with 9 undergoing HT and 3 dying on device. In patients with only LVAD, RHF was present in 111/207 (55%) between 1 week to 1 month and 28/116 (25%) between 1 and 3 months. Younger age, smaller weight, Intermacs profile 1, chemical paralysis, and pulsatile flow VAD were associated with RHF. RHF was associated with increased risk of death on device at both >1 month (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.7, p = 0.007) and >3 month (hazard ratio 6.9, 95% CI 2-23.1, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In children, RHF is common after durable LVAD implantation, but subsequent RVAD is relatively rare. RHF in children, as indicated by prolonged inotrope support, was associated with an increased risk of death on the device. Whether early RVAD support and higher waitlist status may improve the outcome remains unknown.