Literature DB >> 31925583

Toward Active Community Environmental Policing: Potentials and Limits of a Catalytic Model.

John-Michael Davis1, Yaakov Garb2.   

Abstract

This paper offers a field tested community environmental policing model to address the pressing environmental management challenges of reducing e-waste burning in informal e-waste hubs, and enforcement against informal polluting industries more broadly. This is based on our intervention to reduce e-waste burning in a substantial informal e-waste hub in the West Bank, Palestine, a 45 km2 region in which an estimated 5-10 metric tonnes of cables are burnt daily, causing serious environmental and public health consequences. In analogous e-waste hubs in the global South, environmental management solutions have focused on economically attractive alternatives to replace cable burning or policies that integrate informal recyclers with formal e-waste management systems-achieving little success. Our paper describes a two-pronged intervention in Palestine's e-waste hub, which reduced e-waste burning by 80% through a combination of economically competitive cable grinding services and an "active" community environmental policing initiative that lowered barriers to and successfully advocated for governmental policing of e-waste burning. Our discussion of this intervention addresses the community environmental policing literature, which has documented few successes stories of real improvements to the enforcement of environmental violations. We argue that existing strategies have relied on "passive" approaches comprised of monitoring and reporting environmental violations to advocate for change. Our strategy offers a template to improve outcomes through a more "active" approach, moving from monitoring environmental violations through understanding the rationale and dynamics of violators, identifying environmental policing barriers, and implementing a feasible and persuasive strategy to overcome them.

Keywords:  Citizen science; Community environmental policing; E-waste; Environmental governance; Informal; Palestine

Year:  2020        PMID: 31925583     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01252-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  16 in total

Review 1.  Informal electronic waste recycling: a sector review with special focus on China.

Authors:  Xinwen Chi; Martin Streicher-Porte; Mark Y L Wang; Markus A Reuter
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  The Best-of-2-Worlds philosophy: developing local dismantling and global infrastructure network for sustainable e-waste treatment in emerging economies.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Jaco Huisman; Christina E M Meskers; Mathias Schluep; Ab Stevels; Christian Hagelüken
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 7.145

3.  Burdens of PBBs, PBDEs, and PCBs in tissues of the cancer patients in the e-waste disassembly sites in Zhejiang, China.

Authors:  Gaofeng Zhao; Zijian Wang; Huaidong Zhou; Qing Zhao
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Potential health risk for residents around a typical e-waste recycling zone via inhalation of size-fractionated particle-bound heavy metals.

Authors:  Chun-Li Huang; Lian-Jun Bao; Pei Luo; Zhao-Yi Wang; Shao-Meng Li; Eddy Y Zeng
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Inhalation cancer risk associated with exposure to complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures in an electronic waste and urban area in South China.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Shejun Chen; Mi Tian; Xiaobo Zheng; Leah Gonzales; Takeshi Ohura; Bixian Mai; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kristen Grant; Fiona C Goldizen; Peter D Sly; Marie-Noel Brune; Maria Neira; Martin van den Berg; Rosana E Norman
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 26.763

7.  PCDD/Fs, PBDD/Fs, and PBDEs in the air of an e-waste recycling area (Taizhou) in China: current levels, composition profiles, and potential cancer risks.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Ye-Ru Huang; She-Jun Chen; Ai-Min Liu; Peng-Jun Xu; Nan Li; Li Qi; Yue Ren; Zhi-Guang Zhou; Bi-Xian Mai
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-11-05

8.  Heavy metals in food, house dust, and water from an e-waste recycling area in South China and the potential risk to human health.

Authors:  Jing Zheng; Ke-hui Chen; Xiao Yan; She-Jun Chen; Guo-Cheng Hu; Xiao-Wu Peng; Jian-gang Yuan; Bi-Xian Mai; Zhong-Yi Yang
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.291

9.  A relative risk assessment of the open burning of WEEE.

Authors:  Alessandra Cesaro; Vincenzo Belgiorno; Giuliana Gorrasi; Gianluca Viscusi; Mentore Vaccari; Giovanni Vinti; Aleksander Jandric; Maria Isabel Dias; Andrew Hursthouse; Stefan Salhofer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Unfair trade: e-waste in Africa.

Authors:  Charles W Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of Internet of Things and Naive Bayes in Public Health Environmental Management of Government Institutions in China.

Authors:  Zhipeng Zhang; Shuxiang Zhang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.