| Literature DB >> 31924832 |
Rui-Lin Yang1, Qin Li2, Qing-Ping Hu3.
Abstract
In this study, we determined the influences of different drying techniques such as natural air (ND), hot-air (HD), vacuum (VD), infrared (ID), microwave (MD), and freeze drying (FD) methods on the color, shrinkage ratio (SR), rehydration ratio (RR), firmness, crispness, microstructures, nutritional components, and free amino acids of Pleurotus eryngii. The results showed that these parameters were markedly influenced by different drying techniques. Among them, FD was the most effective drying method which retained the main characteristics of the fresh P. eryngii in above mentioned indexes, followed by ND and HD at 40 °C. Finally, despite the least drying time, MD treatment was not suitable to the drying process of P. eryngii slices since it damaged physicochemical properties and caused massive losses of the main nutrients and free amino acids. The results will provide a theoretical basis for industrial processing of P. eryngii.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31924832 PMCID: PMC6954260 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56901-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Color of fresh and dried P. eryngii slices.
| Color parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | ΔE | |
| Fresh | 72.8 ± 3.9ab | −0.2 ± 0.2d | 4.6 ± 0.5c | |
| ND | 55.5 ± 4.0cd | 1.7 ± 0.3b | 10.3 ± 0.9bc | 21.3 ± 2.6 bc |
| HD40 | 64.1 ± 2.8bc | 1.6 ± 0.4bc | 15.5 ± 4.9b | 19.4 ± 1.1 c |
| HD60 | 54.5 ± 4.2cd | 1.4 ± 0.3bc | 13.4 ± 2.4b | 23.7 ± 2.3 bc |
| VD40 | 53.4 ± 3.7de | 2.5 ± 0.4b | 11.4 ± 1.2b | 23.8 ± 1.3 bc |
| VD60 | 52.3 ± 2.8de | 2.2 ± 0.8b | 10.6 ± 1.1b | 24.4 ± 1.5 bc |
| ID40 | 53.7 ± 2.4de | 1.5 ± 0.4bc | 11.7 ± 1.9b | 23.5 ± 1.8 bc |
| ID60 | 51.8 ± 2.4de | 2.4 ± 0.2b | 13.2 ± 0.5b | 25.8 ± 2.1 b |
| MD | 44.6 ± 3.0e | 7.9 ± 0.8a | 25.8 ± 1.5a | 39.3 ± 3.2 a |
| FD | 79.3 ± 1.6a | 0.4 ± 0.3cd | 10.1 ± 1.9bc | 11.2 ± 0.8 d |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate measurements. Different letters within a column indicate statistically significant differences between the means (p < 0.05) for L*, a*, b*and ΔE.
Figure 1Shrinkage ratio (SR) and rehydration ratio (RR) of dried P. eryngii using different drying methods. Different small letters indicate statistically significant differences between the means (p < 0.05) for SR and RR.
Figure 2Firmness and crispness of dried P. eryngii using different drying methods. Different small letters indicate statistically significant differences between the means (p < 0.05) for firmness and crispness.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of dried P. eryngii samples. the left, samples surface; the right, samples lateral section.
Moisture content and proximate compositions (g/100 g dw) of fresh and dried P. eryngii samples.
| Moisture | Protein | Fat | Ash | Reducing sugar | Carbohydrate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | 22.1 ± 0.2b | 2.5 ± 0.2a | 6.5 ± 0.2a | 2.9 ± 0.3a | 63.4 ± 0.5e | |
| ND | 4.7 ± 0.4a | 21.9 ± 0.1b | 2.3 ± 0.1a | 6.7 ± 0.3a | 2.8 ± 0.2a | 63.3 ± 0.7e |
| HD40 | 4.6 ± 0.3a | 21.4 ± 0.3bc | 2.3 ± 0.3a | 6.4 ± 0.1a | 2.4 ± 0.1ab | 64.3 ± 0.5e |
| HD60 | 4.5 ± 0.2a | 20.8 ± 0.4c | 2.4 ± 0.1a | 6.3 ± 0.4a | 2.0 ± 0.2bc | 65.0 ± 0.6de |
| VD40 | 4.9 ± 0.5a | 18.2 ± 0.2d | 2.3 ± 0.2a | 6.5 ± 0.5a | 2.0 ± 0.2bc | 67.1 ± 0.4 cd |
| VD60 | 4.8 ± 0.3a | 17.5 ± 0.5de | 2.2 ± 0.4a | 6.4 ± 0.6a | 1.5 ± 0.1cd | 68.1 ± 0.5bc |
| ID40 | 4.5 ± 0.4a | 17.9 ± 0.1de | 1.5 ± 0.2b | 6.6 ± 0.3a | 1.9 ± 0.2bc | 68.5 ± 0.6bc |
| ID60 | 4.4 ± 0.2a | 17.1 ± 0.4e | 1.4 ± 0.1b | 6.4 ± 0.2a | 1.3 ± 0.1de | 69.7 ± 1.3ab |
| MD | 4.2 ± 0.4a | 15.6 ± 0.3f | 1.2 ± 0.3b | 6.9 ± 0.6a | 0.8 ± 0.1e | 71.1 ± 1.0a |
| FD | 4.4 ± 0.6a | 25.7 ± 0.2a | 2.1 ± 0.2a | 6.5 ± 0.4a | 2.9 ± 0.3a | 60.3 ± 0.8 f |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate measurements. Different letters within a column indicate statistically significant differences between the means (p < 0.05) for moisture, protein, fat, ash, reducing sugar and carbohydrate.
Contents of free amino acids of fresh and dried P. eryngii samples.
| Amino acids | Fresh | ND | HD40 | HD60 | VD40 | VD60 | ID40 | ID60 | MD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid content (mg/g) | ||||||||||
| Glycine | 2.12 ± 0.15 | 1.71 ± 0.21 | 1.33 ± 0.16 | 1.07 ± 0.11 | 1.75 ± 0.26 | 1.32 ± 0.16 | 1.44 ± 0.06 | 1.23 ± 0.66 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | 2.05 ± 0.16 |
| Alanine | 6.44 ± 0.36 | 5.29 ± 0.32 | 4.68 ± 0.53 | 3.31 ± 0.23 | 3.48 ± 0.52 | 2.55 ± 0.21 | 2.94 ± 0.35 | 2.16 ± 1.38 | 1.45 ± 0.20 | 5.83 ± 0.34 |
| Valine | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.42 ± 0.33 |
| Isoleucine | 2.55 ± 0.24 | 1.89 ± 0.61 | 1.36 ± 0.08 | 1.05 ± 0.15 | 1.39 ± 0.14 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.14 | 2.14 ± 0.21 |
| Leucine | 4.32 ± 0.20 | 3.79 ± 0.22 | 4.08 ± 0.37 | 4.84 ± 0.29 | 3.92 ± 0.41 | 3.73 ± 0.24 | 3.25 ± 0.53 | 2.66 ± 0.19 | 1.46 ± 0.16 | 4.03 ± 0.28 |
| Aspartic acid | 3.30 ± 0.25 | 1.52 ± 0.12 | 1.55 ± 0.19 | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 1.47 ± 0.22 | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 1.22 ± 0.21 | 0.95 ± 0.11 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 3.55 ± 0.33 |
| Glutamic acid | 8.25 ± 0.54 | 5.78 ± 0.33 | 5.56 ± 0.41 | 6.25 ± 0.38 | 4.64 ± 0.21 | 3.99 ± 0.30 | 4.77 ± 0.35 | 4.43 ± 0.38 | 2.12 ± 0.15 | 7.60 ± 0.58 |
| Arginine | 1.48 ± 0.26 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.22 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.07 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | nd | nd | 1.33 ± 0.09 |
| Lysine | 5.33 ± 0.52 | 4.94 ± 0.15 | 3.12 ± 0.29 | 2.08 ± 0.15 | 3.43 ± 0.17 | 1.04 ± 0.16 | 3.54 ± 0.39 | 1.24 ± 0.99 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 4.24 ± 0.22 |
| Histidine | 2.47 ± 0.35 | 1.33 ± 0.07 | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.31 | 0.56 ± 0.36 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 1.97 ± 0.21 |
| Phenylalanine | 4.96 ± 0.36 | 4.13 ± 0.20 | 4.00 ± 0.36 | 3.20 ± 0.14 | 4.34 ± 0.52 | 4.05 ± 0.28 | 3.06 ± 0.42 | 2.75 ± 0.17 | 1.55 ± 0.13 | 5.11 ± 0.42 |
| Tyrosine | 2.98 ± 0.21 | 2.54 ± 0.36 | 2.13 ± 0.34 | 1.78 ± 0.32 | 2.34 ± 0.21 | 1.90 ± 0.20 | 1.77 ± 0.14 | 1.12 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 3.54 ± 0.13 |
| Threonine | 3.32 ± 0.31 | 2.82 ± 0.09 | 2.22 ± 0.16 | 1.45 ± 0.24 | 1.56 ± 0.08 | 1.13 ± 0.14 | 0.34 ± 0.44 | 0.88 ± 0.11 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 3.21 ± 0.36 |
| Serine | 1.93 ± 0.26 | 1.75 ± 0.35 | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 1.82 ± 0.14 | 1.06 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.78 ± 0.62 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 2.22 ± 0.17 |
| Tryptophan | 4.35 ± 0.41 | 2.90 ± 0.31 | 1.70 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.13 | 1.54 ± 0.27 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 3.54 ± 0.24 |
| Cysteine | 0.85 ± 0.13 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.50 ± 0.05 |
| Methionine | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | nd | 0.06 ± 0.01 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.64 ± 0.08 |
| Proline | 2.93 ± 0.31 | 1.82 ± 0.08 | 1.46 ± 0.15 | 0.69 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.13 | 0.14 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | nd | 1.88 ± 0.11 |
| TEAA | 26.31 ± 1.62 | 21.11 ± 3.55 | 16.63 ± 0.13 | 13.58 ± 1.56 | 16.24 ± 2.30 | 10.83 ± 0.89 | 10.50 ± 0.69 | 7.67 ± 0.64 | 5.04 ± 0.48 | 23.33 ± 1.36 |
| NEAA | 32.75 ± 0.25 | 22.49 ± 0.34 | 19.27 ± 0.61 | 17.16 ± 0.99 | 16.63 ± 1.88 | 12.05 ± 0.93 | 14.16 ± 1.57 | 11.08 ± 1.12 | 5.84 ± 0.35 | 30.47 ± 2.06 |
| TFAA | 59.06 ± 3.23 | 43.60 ± 0.28 | 35.90 ± 2.78 | 30.74 ± 2.33 | 32.87 ± 2.06 | 22.88 ± 1.57 | 24.66 ± 1.98 | 18.75 ± 1.38 | 10.88 ± 0.92 | 53.80 ± 3.27 |
| TFAA/protein (%) | ||||||||||
| 26.72 ± 2.12 | 19.91 ± 1.76 | 16.78 ± 2.01 | 14.78 ± 1.64 | 18.06 ± 2.03 | 13.07 ± 1.63 | 13.78 ± 1.20 | 10.96 ± 0.88 | 6.97 ± 0.45 | 20.93 ± 1.66 | |
nd, not detected. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate measurements.
Figure 4Clustering results of FAA data analysis of fresh and dried P. eryngii using different drying methods.