Literature DB >> 31924562

The effect of dulaglutide on stroke: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial.

Hertzel C Gerstein1, Robert Hart2, Helen M Colhoun3, Rafael Diaz4, Mark Lakshmanan5, Fady T Botros5, Jeffrey Probstfield6, Matthew C Riddle7, Lars Rydén8, Charles Messan Atisso5, Leanne Dyal2, Stephanie Hall2, Alvaro Avezum9, Jan Basile10, Ignacio Conget11, William C Cushman12, Nicolae Hancu13, Markolf Hanefeld14, Petr Jansky15, Matyas Keltai16, Fernando Lanas17, Lawrence A Leiter18, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo19, Ernesto Germán Cardona Muñoz20, Nana Pogosova21, Peter J Raubenheimer22, Jonathan E Shaw23, Wayne H-H Sheu24, Theodora Temelkova-Kurktschiev25.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcome trials have suggested that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists might reduce strokes. We analysed the effect of dulaglutide on stroke within the researching cardiovascular events with a weekly incretin in diabetes (REWIND) trial.
METHODS: REWIND was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women (aged ≥50 years) with established or newly detected type 2 diabetes whose HbA1c was 9·5% or less (with no lower limit) on stable doses of up to two oral glucose-lowering drugs with or without basal insulin therapy were eligible if their body-mass index was at least 23 kg/m2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to weekly subcutaneous injections of either masked dulaglutide 1·5 mg or the same volume of masked placebo (containing the same excipients but without dulaglutide). Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random code with an interactive web response system with stratification by site. Participants, investigators, the trial leadership, and all other personnel were masked to treatment allocation until the trial was completed and the database was locked. During the treatment period, participants in both groups were instructed to inject study drug on the same day at around the same time, each week. Strokes were categorised as fatal or non-fatal, and as either ischaemic, haemorrhagic, or undetermined. Stroke severity was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. Participants were seen at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then every 3 months for drug dispensing and every 6 months for detailed assessments, until 1200 confirmed primary outcomes accrued. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of any component of the composite outcome, which comprised non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular or unknown causes. All analyses were done according to an intention-to-treat strategy that included all randomly assigned participants, irrespective of adherence. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01394952.
FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, we screened 12 133 patients, of whom 9901 with type 2 diabetes and additional cardiovascular risk factors were randomly assigned to either dulaglutide (n=4949) or an equal volume of placebo (n=4952). During a median follow-up of 5·4 years, cerebrovascular and other cardiovascular outcomes were ascertained and adjudicated. 158 (3·2%) of 4949 participants assigned to dulaglutide and 205 (4·1%) of 4952 participants assigned to placebo had a stroke during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·62-0·94; p=0·010). Dulaglutide reduced ischaemic stroke (0·75, 0·59-0·94, p=0·012) but had no effect on haemorrhagic stroke (1·05, 0·55-1·99; p=0·89). Dulaglutide also reduced the composite of non-fatal stroke or all-cause death (0·88, 0·79-0·98; p=0·017) and disabling stroke (0·74, 0·56-0·99; p=0·042). The degree of disability after stroke did not differ by treatment group.
INTERPRETATION: Long-term dulaglutide use might reduce clinically relevant ischaemic stroke in people with type 2 diabetes but does not affect stroke severity. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31924562     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30423-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  10 in total

1.  Repurposing GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Parkinson's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Daniella Balduino Victorino; Mariana Nejm; Marcia Guimarães-Marques; Fulvio Alexandre Scorza; Carla Alessandra Scorza
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-01-07

2.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as neuroprotective agents for ischemic stroke: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Mark P Maskery; Christian Holscher; Stephanie P Jones; Christopher I Price; W David Strain; Caroline L Watkins; David J Werring; Hedley Ca Emsley
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kanie; Atsushi Mizuno; Yoshimitsu Takaoka; Takahiro Suzuki; Daisuke Yoneoka; Yuri Nishikawa; Wilson Wai San Tam; Jakub Morze; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Yiqiao Xin; Olivia Wu; Rui Providencia; Joey Sw Kwong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

4.  Efficacy of dulaglutide on vascular health indexes in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Antonino Tuttolomondo; Anna Cirrincione; Alessandra Casuccio; Alessandro Del Cuore; Mario Daidone; Tiziana Di Chiara; Domenico Di Raimondo; Vittoriano Della Corte; Carlo Maida; Irene Simonetta; Stefania Scaglione; Antonio Pinto
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 5.  GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Beyond Their Pancreatic Effects.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Minghe Wang; Zhitong Wen; Zhihong Lu; Lijuan Cui; Chao Fu; Huan Xue; Yunfeng Liu; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists - Potential Game Changers in the Treatment of Glaucoma?

Authors:  Zaynab Ahmad Mouhammad; Rupali Vohra; Anna Horwitz; Anna-Sophie Thein; Jens Rovelt; Barbara Cvenkel; Pete A Williams; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Miriam Kolko
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): A Novel Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Shuang Gao; Yuanyuan Zhang; Kaini Liang; Ran Bi; Yanan Du
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.131

8.  Long-term trends in the prescription of antidiabetic drugs: real-world evidence from the Diabetes Registry Tyrol 2012-2018.

Authors:  Clemens Engler; Marco Leo; Bernhard Pfeifer; Martin Juchum; Di Chen-Koenig; Karin Poelzl; Hans Schoenherr; David Vill; Juliana Oberdanner; Egon Eisendle; Klaus Middeldorf; Bernhard Heindl; Hannes Gaenzer; Gerald Bode; Karl Kirchmeyr; Guenther Ladner; Lisa Rieger; Ursula Koellensperger; Andrea Schwaiger; Florian Stoeckl; Guenther Zangerl; Monika Lechleitner; Irmgard Delmarko; Wilhelm Oberaigner; Clemens Rissbacher; Herbert Tilg; Christoph Ebenbichler
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-09

9.  Exploring potential mediators of the cardiovascular benefit of dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes patients in REWIND.

Authors:  Manige Konig; Matthew C Riddle; Helen M Colhoun; Kelley R Branch; Charles M Atisso; Mark C Lakshmanan; Reema Mody; Sohini Raha; Hertzel C Gerstein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Normalisation of glucose metabolism by exendin-4 in the chronic phase after stroke promotes functional recovery in male diabetic mice.

Authors:  Ingrid Lovise Augestad; Doortje Dekens; Dimitra Karampatsi; Osama Elabi; Alexander Zabala; Hiranya Pintana; Martin Larsson; Thomas Nyström; Gesine Paul; Vladimer Darsalia; Cesare Patrone
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 8.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.