Wei Juan1, Huang Zhen2, Feng Yan-Ying3, Yang Hui-Xian2, Zhong Tao2, Guo Pei-Fen2, Huo Jian-Tian2. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, China. Electronic address: chenxi1105@163.com. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, China. 3. Nursing Department, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Dysphagia is a common symptom seen in stroke patients, it not only affects patients' nutrition supply, but also causes aspiration pneumonia. To solve the problem of nutritional support for patients with dysphagia after stroke, nasogastric tubes are routinely indwelling to provide nutrition in China. However, this feeding method sometimes causes food reflux, aspiration, pneumonia, and often affects the patients' comfort and self-image acceptance. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new feeding method called intermittent oroesophageal (IOE) tube feeding compared with continuous nasogastric tube feeding as a practical and beneficial mean of decreasing the rate of stroke associated pneumonia (SAP), and improving patients' swallowing function, comfort, psychological status. DESIGN: This was an assessor-blinded, single-center, randomized controlled trial. METHODS:Ninety-seven hospitalized stroke patients with dysphagia in the rehabilitation department from January to December 2018 were randomized to a control group and an intervention group. Patients in both groups received routine nursing, rehabilitation treatment and swallowing therapy. Patients in the intervention group were given IOE tube feeding, while those in the control group were fed by indwelling nasogastric tube. Outcomes were assessed at admission, discharge or the end of the tube feeding. RESULTS: The incidence of SAP in the intervention group was 16.33% lower than that (31.25%) in the control group; the comfort score (2.08 ± .64), anxiety score (10.98 ± 2.28), depression score (7.39 ± 2.16) were lower than those (3.02 ± .70), (12.10 ± 2.18), (8.42 ± 2.34) in the control group. The improvement rate of swallowing function in the intervention group was 83.67% higher than that (66.67%) in the control group (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The IOE tube feeding compared with continuous tube feeding may reduce the incidence of SAP, and improve patients' swallowing function, comfort, psychological status in patients with dysphagia after stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Dysphagia is a common symptom seen in strokepatients, it not only affects patients' nutrition supply, but also causes aspiration pneumonia. To solve the problem of nutritional support for patients with dysphagia after stroke, nasogastric tubes are routinely indwelling to provide nutrition in China. However, this feeding method sometimes causes food reflux, aspiration, pneumonia, and often affects the patients' comfort and self-image acceptance. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new feeding method called intermittent oroesophageal (IOE) tube feeding compared with continuous nasogastric tube feeding as a practical and beneficial mean of decreasing the rate of stroke associated pneumonia (SAP), and improving patients' swallowing function, comfort, psychological status. DESIGN: This was an assessor-blinded, single-center, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Ninety-seven hospitalized strokepatients with dysphagia in the rehabilitation department from January to December 2018 were randomized to a control group and an intervention group. Patients in both groups received routine nursing, rehabilitation treatment and swallowing therapy. Patients in the intervention group were given IOE tube feeding, while those in the control group were fed by indwelling nasogastric tube. Outcomes were assessed at admission, discharge or the end of the tube feeding. RESULTS: The incidence of SAP in the intervention group was 16.33% lower than that (31.25%) in the control group; the comfort score (2.08 ± .64), anxiety score (10.98 ± 2.28), depression score (7.39 ± 2.16) were lower than those (3.02 ± .70), (12.10 ± 2.18), (8.42 ± 2.34) in the control group. The improvement rate of swallowing function in the intervention group was 83.67% higher than that (66.67%) in the control group (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The IOE tube feeding compared with continuous tube feeding may reduce the incidence of SAP, and improve patients' swallowing function, comfort, psychological status in patients with dysphagia after stroke.