Literature DB >> 31923922

Diagnostic performance of different cholangioscopes in patients with biliary strictures: a systematic review.

Santi Kulpatcharapong1, Rapat Pittayanon1, Stephen J Kerr2, Rungsun Rerknimitr1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cholangioscopy provides direct intraductual imaging, which can enhance diagnostic efficacy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary strictures. This study aimed to review the diagnostic yield of different cholangioscopes for the diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture (MBS).
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed. Full papers of prospective studies using any type of peroral cholangioscope (POC) were included without language restriction. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of various POCs to diagnose MBS.
RESULTS: Data from 20 published articles, involving 1141 patients, were extracted. Overall sensitivities of POCs for diagnosing MBS were higher for the diagnosis made under visual impression compared with those from cholangioscopy-guided biopsy (67 % - 100 % vs. 38 % - 100 %), whereas the overall specificities were generally high and comparable (73 % - 100 % vs. 75 % - 100 %). Newer video cholangioscopes (digital single-operator POC [digital SOC], direct POC) with the exception of video dual-operator mother - baby POC (video DOC), provided better sensitivity of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy compared with fiberoptic scopes (digital SOC 80 % - 85 %, direct POC 80 % - 100 %, video DOC 38 % - 100 %, and fiberoptic SOC 49 % - 100 %, respectively). Among these video cholangioscopes, the digital SOC provided the highest technical success rate, at 100 %.
CONCLUSIONS: POCs enhanced the diagnostic yield for diagnosis of MBS. Compared with fiberoptic POCs that only provide good image impression, the digital SOC and direct POC were good at both image impression and cholangioscopy-guided biopsy to diagnose MBS. To ensure high technical success for MBS diagnosis, the digital SOC is a good option. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31923922     DOI: 10.1055/a-1083-6105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  4 in total

1.  An international experience with single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in patients with altered anatomy.

Authors:  Shruti Mony; Bachir Ghandour; Isaac Raijman; Amar Manvar; Sammy Ho; Arvind J Trindade; Petros C Benias; Claudio Zulli; Jérémie Jacques; Yervant Ichkhanian; Tobias Zuchelli; Mouhanna Abu Ghanimeh; Shayan Irani; Andrew Canakis; Omid Sanaei; Daniel Szvarca; Linda Zhang; Michael Bejjani; Venkata Akshintala; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Comparison of tube-assisted mapping biopsy with digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for preoperative evaluation of biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Takeda; Takashi Sasaki; Takafumi Mie; Takeshi Okamoto; Chinatsu Mori; Takaaki Furukawa; Yuto Yamada; Akiyoshi Kasuga; Masato Matsuyama; Masato Ozaka; Naoki Sasahira
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 3.  The Diagnostic Dilemma of Malignant Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Robert Dorrell; Swati Pawa; Yi Zhou; Neeraj Lalwani; Rishi Pawa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-25

4.  Usefulness of peroral cholangioscopy in the differential diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yasutaka Ishii; Masahiro Serikawa; Tomofumi Tsuboi; Ryota Kawamura; Ken Tsushima; Shinya Nakamura; Tetsuro Hirano; Ayami Fukiage; Juri Ikemoto; Yusuke Kiyoshita; Sho Saeki; Yosuke Tamura; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.