Literature DB >> 31923822

Comparison of supervised machine learning classification techniques in prediction of locoregional recurrences in early oral tongue cancer.

Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi1, Mohammed Elmusrati2, Iris Sawazaki-Calone3, Luiz Paulo Kowalski4, Caj Haglund5, Ricardo D Coletta6, Antti A Mäkitie7, Tuula Salo8, Alhadi Almangush9, Ilmo Leivo10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proper estimate of the risk of recurrences in early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is mandatory for individual treatment-decision making. However, this remains a challenge even for experienced multidisciplinary centers.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting the risk of locoregional recurrences in patients with OTSCC. These algorithms were Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Boosted Decision Tree (BDT), and Decision Forest (DF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised 311 cases from the five University Hospitals in Finland and A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil. For comparison of the algorithms, we used the harmonic mean of precision and recall called F1 score, specificity, and accuracy values. These algorithms and their corresponding permutation feature importance (PFI) with the input parameters were externally tested on 59 new cases. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the algorithm that showed the highest prediction accuracy with the prognostic significance of depth of invasion (DOI).
RESULTS: The results showed that the average specificity of all the algorithms was 71% . The SVM showed an accuracy of 68% and F1 score of 0.63, NB an accuracy of 70% and F1 score of 0.64, BDT an accuracy of 81% and F1 score of 0.78, and DF an accuracy of 78% and F1 score of 0.70. Additionally, these algorithms outperformed the DOI-based approach, which gave an accuracy of 63%. With PFI-analysis, there was no significant difference in the overall accuracies of three of the algorithms; PFI-BDT accuracy increased to 83.1%, PFI-DF increased to 80%, PFI-SVM decreased to 64.4%, while PFI-NB accuracy increased significantly to 81.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the best classification accuracy was achieved with the boosted decision tree algorithm. Additionally, these algorithms outperformed the DOI-based approach. Furthermore, with few parameters identified in the PFI analysis, ML technique still showed the ability to predict locoregional recurrence. The application of boosted decision tree machine learning algorithm can stratify OTSCC patients and thus aid in their individual treatment planning.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Oral tongue cancer; Prediction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31923822     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  10 in total

1.  Predictive Supervised Machine Learning Models for Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  L J Muhammad; Ebrahem A Algehyne; Sani Sharif Usman
Journal:  SN Comput Sci       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Oral Diseases: Applications and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Shankargouda Patil; Sarah Albogami; Jagadish Hosmani; Sheetal Mujoo; Mona Awad Kamil; Manawar Ahmad Mansour; Hina Naim Abdul; Shilpa Bhandi; Shiek S S J Ahmed
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Supervised Machine Learning Models for Prediction of COVID-19 Infection using Epidemiology Dataset.

Authors:  L J Muhammad; Ebrahem A Algehyne; Sani Sharif Usman; Abdulkadir Ahmad; Chinmay Chakraborty; I A Mohammed
Journal:  SN Comput Sci       Date:  2020-11-27

4.  Deep Machine Learning for Oral Cancer: From Precise Diagnosis to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi; Alhadi Almangush; Mohammed Elmusrati; Antti A Mäkitie
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Mladen Marinkovic; Marina Popovic; Suzana Stojanovic-Rundic; Milos Nikolic; Milena Cavic; Dusica Gavrilovic; Dusan Teodorovic; Nenad Mitrovic; Ljiljana Mijatovic Teodorovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Prediction of Hospitalized Patients with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Susel Góngora Alonso; Gonçalo Marques; Deevyankar Agarwal; Isabel De la Torre Díez; Manuel Franco-Martín
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication.

Authors:  Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi; Alhadi Almangush; Mohammed Elmusrati; Ilmo Leivo; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Deep Neural Networks and Binary Particle Swarm Optimization on Histopathological Images: An AIoMT Approach.

Authors:  Mohanad A Deif; Hani Attar; Ayman Amer; Ismail A Elhaty; Mohammad R Khosravi; Ahmed A A Solyman
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30

Review 9.  Application and Performance of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oral Cancer Diagnosis and Prediction of Prognosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanagar; Sachin Naik; Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Kheraif; Satish Vishwanathaiah; Prabhadevi C Maganur; Yaser Alhazmi; Shazia Mushtaq; Sachin C Sarode; Gargi S Sarode; Alessio Zanza; Luca Testarelli; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

10.  Utilizing Deep Machine Learning for Prognostication of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi; Ibrahim O Bello; Omar Youssef; Mohammed Elmusrati; Antti A Mäkitie; Alhadi Almangush
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.