Literature DB >> 31923738

Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of percutaneous-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: A multicentric Italian experience.

Salvatore Gueli Alletti1, Emanuele Perrone2, Antonio Cretì2, Stefano Cianci3, Stefano Uccella4, Camilla Fedele2, Francesco Fanfani5, Stefano Palmieri6, Anna Fagotti5, Giovanni Scambia5, Cristiano Rossitto7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This multicentric prospective phase II study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of perioperative outcomes, feasibility, VAS score, and cosmetic outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: Between May 2015 and October 2017, 382 patients were considered eligible for minimally invasive percutaneous-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using Percuvance™, Percutaneous Surgical System - PSS, TELEFLEX ltd. Among them, 80 patients (20.9 %) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The coordinator center was the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Enrolled patients underwent total percutaneous-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy ± bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy ± nodal assessment.
RESULTS: The median age was 52 (range, 32-80) years, and the median body mass index was 25 kg/m2 (range, 16-37). Thirty-five patients (43.8 %) had previous surgery. A median operative time of 82.5 (range, 40-190) minutes and a median estimated blood loss of 50 (50-500) mL were registered. We observed 1 (1.3 %) intraoperative complication. The median time to discharge was 1 (range, 1-5) day. Patients were extremely satisfied with the scar evaluation and postoperative pain control. Five (6.25 %) complications were recorded within 30 days after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous-assisted technique for extrafascial hysterectomy achieved excellent results in terms of feasibility, safety, and efficacy, even in complex cases and advanced surgical procedures. Therefore, the technique appears to balance the limitations and advantages of minimal surgical invasiveness and standard approach efficacy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecology; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; New technology; Percutaneous

Year:  2019        PMID: 31923738     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Percutaneous-assisted laparoscopy for ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Benito Chiofalo; Valentina Bruno; Mauro Calandra; Delia Savone; Emanuela Mancini; Ermelinda Baiocco; Marcello Iacobelli; Andrea Giannini; Enrico Vizza
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Update of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecological Pathology: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Elisa Scarpelli; Giulia Armano; Luciano Monfardini; Angela Celardo; Gaetano Maria Munno; Nicola Fortunato; Primo Vagnetti; Maria Teresa Schettino; Giulia Grassini; Domenico Labriola; Carla Loreto; Marco Torella; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 3.  Ultra-minimally invasive surgery in gynecological patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Gaetano Riemma; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  A Multicentric Randomized Trial to Evaluate the ROle of Uterine MANipulator on Laparoscopic/Robotic HYsterectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The ROMANHY Trial.

Authors:  Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Emanuele Perrone; Camilla Fedele; Stefano Cianci; Tina Pasciuto; Vito Chiantera; Stefano Uccella; Alfredo Ercoli; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Anna Fagotti; Valerio Gallotta; Francesco Cosentino; Barbara Costantini; Stefano Restaino; Giorgia Monterossi; Andrea Rosati; Luigi Carlo Turco; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Francesco Fanfani; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Scar-Free Laparoscopy in BRCA-Mutated Women.

Authors:  Stefano Restaino; Angelo Finelli; Giulia Pellecchia; Anna Biasioli; Jessica Mauro; Carlo Ronsini; Monica Della Martina; Martina Arcieri; Luigi Della Corte; Felice Sorrentino; Lorenza Driul; Giuseppe Vizzielli
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 6.  Role of uterine manipulator during laparoscopic endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Uccella; Gaetano Riemma; Mattia Tarascio; Marco Torella; Pasquale De Franciscis; Nicola Colacurci; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.