Literature DB >> 31923516

Fabrication and in-vitro biocompatibility of freeze-dried CTS-nHA and CTS-nBG scaffolds for bone regeneration applications.

Pawan Kumar1, Meenu Saini1, Brijnandan S Dehiya2, Ahmad Umar3, Anil Sindhu4, Hiba Mohammed5, Yas Al-Hadeethi6, Zhanhu Guo7.   

Abstract

The thought of biodegradable organic-inorganic composites composed of natural polymer chitosan and ceramic nanoparticles (hydroxyapatite and bioglass) can be considered as a solution for hard tissue engineering. In this paper, we described a comparative assessment of chitosan-nanohydroxyapatite (CTS-nHA) and chitosan-nano-bioglass (CTS-nBG) scaffolds. The dispersion of nanoscaled hydroxyapatite (nHA) and bioglass (nBG) in chitosan remained satisfactory. The freeze-dried composite based CTS-nHA and CTS-nBG scaffolds shown porous structure. The physiochemical and morphological analysis of all samples has been performed through X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SEM image confirmed the presence of spherically shaped nHA particles of 4.20 μm and irregularly shaped nBG particles of 6.89 μm. The TEM analysis revealed the existence of 165.52 to 255.17 nm sized nHA particles and 167.35 to 334.69 nm sized nBG particles. TEM analysis also showed the interconnected structure of CTS-nHA and CTS-nBG nanocomposites. After seven days' incubation period, the CTS-nHA and CTS-nBG scaffolds shown good mineralization behavior in simulated body fluid (SBF). The CTS-nHA scaffolds exhibited enhanced compressive strength and elastic modulus compared with the CTS-nBG sample. The cell culture experiment revealed that fabricated scaffolds had good compatibility with fibroblast cells (L929, ATCC) and MG-63 which are able to adhere, proliferate, and migrate through the porous structure. All the obtained results clearly recommend that pre-loaded hydroxyapatite and bioglass nanoparticles can enhance the apatite formation. The scaffolds with chitosan, bioglass, and hydroxyapatite have better biomechanical characteristics and allow cell growth. Therefore, these scaffolds can be perfect candidates for various hard tissue engineering applications such as bone regeneration.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Bioglass; Chitosan; Freeze-drying; Hydroxyapatite; Nanoparticles; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31923516     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol        ISSN: 0141-8130            Impact factor:   6.953


  4 in total

1.  Fabrication and Characterization of Ceftizoxime-Loaded Pectin Nanocarriers.

Authors:  Pawan Kumar; Vinod Kumar; Ravinder Kumar; Catalin Iulian Pruncu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Influences of Process Parameters of Near-Field Direct-Writing Melt Electrospinning on Performances of Polycaprolactone/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Zhijun Chen; Yanbo Liu; Juan Huang; Ming Hao; Xiaodong Hu; Xiaoming Qian; Jintu Fan; Hongjun Yang; Bo Yang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  Novel Inorganic Nanomaterial-Based Therapy for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Shengjie Cui; Dan Luo; Yan Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  Assessment of the Toxicity of Biocompatible Materials Supporting Bone Regeneration: Impact of the Type of Assay and Used Controls.

Authors:  Milena Chraniuk; Mirosława Panasiuk; Lilit Hovhannisyan; Sabina Żołędowska; Dawid Nidzworski; Lidia Ciołek; Anna Woźniak; Agnieszka Kubiś; Natalia Karska; Zbigniew Jaegermann; Sylwia Rodziewicz-Motowidło; Monika Biernat; Beata Gromadzka
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.