Literature DB >> 3192330

Proportion of lung cancers in males, due to occupation, in different areas of the USA.

P Vineis1, T Thomas, R B Hayes, W J Blot, T J Mason, L W Pickle, P Correa, E T Fontham, J Schoenberg.   

Abstract

Occupational data from 5 case-control studies in the United States involving 2,973 male cases and 3,210 controls were analyzed to estimate the percentage of lung cancer attributable to well-known and suspected lung carcinogens. The studies were conducted in areas heterogeneous in terms of industrial activities. The percentage of lung cancers attributable to occupations entailing potential exposure to well-recognized carcinogens ranged, by study area, from 3 to 17%. The further inclusion of occupational groups with suspect carcinogenic exposures changed these estimates very little. Exclusion of data derived from next-of-kin interviews influenced the estimates of attributable risks, but not in a systematic fashion. The estimates also varied according to ethnic group, smoking status and birth cohort, with higher values in non-whites, non-smokers and among members of more recent birth cohorts. Possible errors in exposure classification, which may make these estimates conservative, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3192330     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910420610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Occupational risk factors of lung cancer: a hospital based case-control study.

Authors:  J H Droste; J J Weyler; J P Van Meerbeeck; P A Vermeire; M P van Sprundel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Barbara A Forey; Katharine J Coombs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Atrophic gastritis in young children and adolescents.

Authors:  O Ricuarte; O Gutierrez; H Cardona; J G Kim; D Y Graham; H M T El-Zimaity
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Occupational risk factors for lung cancer among nonsmoking women: a case-control study in Missouri (United States).

Authors:  R C Brownson; M C Alavanja; J C Chang
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Race and sex differences in associations of vegetables, fruits, and carotenoids with lung cancer risk in New Jersey (United States).

Authors:  J F Dorgan; R G Ziegler; J B Schoenberg; P Hartge; M J McAdams; R T Falk; H B Wilcox; G L Shaw
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Lung cancer risk in painters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neela Guha; Franco Merletti; Nelson Kyle Steenland; Andrea Altieri; Vincent Cogliano; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Risk of cancer for arc welders in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a second follow up (1983-8).

Authors:  N Becker; J Chang-Claude; R Frentzel-Beyme
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-10

8.  Case-control studies in cancer patients as a surveillance system of occupational exposure in the European Community. European Community Working Party.

Authors:  R J Rona; N A Taub; S Rasmussen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Occupational exposure and lung cancer risk in a coastal area of northeastern Italy.

Authors:  M Bovenzi; G Stanta; G Antiga; P Peruzzo; F Cavallieri
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Lung cancer and occupation in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Dario Consonni; Sara De Matteis; Jay H Lubin; Sholom Wacholder; Margaret Tucker; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Neil E Caporaso; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.