Literature DB >> 31923130

Do PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Correlate to the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Trauma Patients?

David N Bernstein1, Alexander S Greenstein1, Taylor D'Amore2, Addisu Mesfin1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Correlational study.
OBJECTIVE: In spine trauma patients, we aimed to assess the correlation of patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and Depression scores with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) ODI/NDI scores. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ODI and NDI were intended as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients seeking spine care. To date, the PROMIS has not been studied in the spine trauma population.
METHODS: Between January 1, 2015 and December 13, 2017, patients presenting to a single, level 1 trauma center spine clinic with known spine trauma were identified. A total of 56 patients (52 operative, 4 nonoperative) representing 181 encounters were identified. PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression, as well as the ODI or NDI, were administered to patients. Spearman rho (ρ) were calculated between PROMs.
RESULTS: A strong correlation exists between PROMIS PI and the ODI (ρ = 0.79, P < 0.001), while a strong-moderate correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the ODI (ρ = -0.61, P < 0.001). A moderate correlation exists between PROMIS Depression and the ODI (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.001). Strong correlations exist between PROMIS PI and the NDI (ρ = 0.71, P < 0.001) and PROMIS Depression and the NDI (ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001). A poor correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the NDI (ρ = -0.28, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains significantly correlate with the ODI and NDI; however, only PROMIS PI strongly correlates with both the NDI and ODI. This suggests that PROMIS PI can be used to capture similar information to that of the ODI or NDI but that PROMIS PF and Depression may offer additional clinical information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31923130     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Unilateral atlanto-occipital injury: A case series and detailed radiographic description.

Authors:  Jacob Richard Lepard; Logan A Reed; Steven M Theiss; Sakthi Rajan Rajaram
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  Efficacy of three-dimensional guide plate technique guided sacral 2 alar iliac screws fixation in patients with degenerative kyphoscoliosis.

Authors:  Liqiang Cui; Shuangquan Gong; Shiming Xie; Lei Zhang; Wusi Peng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  The Presence of Preoperative Depression Symptoms Does Not Hinder Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric W Guo; Austin G Cross; Luke Hessburg; Dylan Koolmees; David N Bernstein; Kareem G Elhage; Vasilios Moutzouros; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-20

4.  Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge.

Authors:  Rafa Rahman; Sara Wallam; Bo Zhang; Rahul Sachdev; Emmanuel L McNeely; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Linking Oswestry Disability Index to the PROMIS pain interference CAT with equipercentile methods.

Authors:  Xiaodan Tang; Benjamin D Schalet; Man Hung; Darrel S Brodke; Charles L Saltzman; David Cella
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.