Paul J Spano1, Saamia Shaikh, Dessy Boneva, Shaikh Hai, Mark McKenney, Adel Elkbuli. 1. From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (P.J.S., S.S., D.B., S.H., M.M., A.E.), Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami; and University of South Florida (D.B., M.M.), Tampa, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a deadly injury. Universally accepted guidelines regarding the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in trauma patients presenting with TBI have not been established. The purpose of this review was to identify and review the current literature and present the evidence for anticoagulant chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients with TBI. METHODS: A search of five databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, JAMA Network, and Cochrane Journals was conducted for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria were used for quality of evidence assessment. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in this review: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 prospective observational studies, 10 retrospective reviews, and 5 systematic reviews. Most studies demonstrated that early chemoprophylactic administration is associated with a decreased incidence of VTE in patients with TBI without an increase in intracranial bleed. CONCLUSION: For patients with TBI resulting in intracranial hemorrhages, administration of VTE chemoprophylaxis is warranted for those patients with stable repeat computed tomography scans. Early chemoprophylaxis, at 24 to 72 hours is associated with reduced VTE incidence without a corresponding increase or exacerbation of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with TBI who have a stable repeat head computed tomography scan. More studies are needed to establish guidelines for the safety and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis protocols in adult patients with TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.
BACKGROUND:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a deadly injury. Universally accepted guidelines regarding the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in traumapatients presenting with TBI have not been established. The purpose of this review was to identify and review the current literature and present the evidence for anticoagulant chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients with TBI. METHODS: A search of five databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, JAMA Network, and Cochrane Journals was conducted for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria were used for quality of evidence assessment. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in this review: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 prospective observational studies, 10 retrospective reviews, and 5 systematic reviews. Most studies demonstrated that early chemoprophylactic administration is associated with a decreased incidence of VTE in patients with TBI without an increase in intracranial bleed. CONCLUSION: For patients with TBI resulting in intracranial hemorrhages, administration of VTE chemoprophylaxis is warranted for those patients with stable repeat computed tomography scans. Early chemoprophylaxis, at 24 to 72 hours is associated with reduced VTE incidence without a corresponding increase or exacerbation of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with TBI who have a stable repeat head computed tomography scan. More studies are needed to establish guidelines for the safety and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis protocols in adult patients with TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level III.
Authors: James P Byrne; Christopher D Witiw; James M Schuster; Jose L Pascual; Jeremy W Cannon; Niels D Martin; Patrick M Reilly; Avery B Nathens; Mark J Seamon Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Lucy Z Kornblith; Matthew D Neal; Maureane Hoffman; Nicola J Mutch; Herbert Schöchl; Beverley J Hunt; Angela Sauaia Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Eric J Ley; Carlos V R Brown; Ernest E Moore; Jack A Sava; Kimberly Peck; David J Ciesla; Jason L Sperry; Anne G Rizzo; Nelson G Rosen; Karen J Brasel; Rosemary Kozar; Kenji Inaba; Matthew J Martin Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Joseph F Rappold; Forest R Sheppard; Samuel P Carmichael Ii; Joseph Cuschieri; Eric Ley; Erika Rangel; Anupamaa J Seshadri; Christopher P Michetti Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-02-24