| Literature DB >> 31921605 |
Reza Soleimani1, Mojgan Mohammadi2,3, Seyed Ahmad Saghebi4, Ali Taghipour5, Ali Khorsand Vakilzadeh6, Jalil Tavakkol Afshari7,8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In Persian medicine (PM), wet-cupping therapy (WCT) is the most utilized approach. WCT is mostly done between the shoulders, which is referred to as "hejamt-e-aam" in the Persian language. CD4+T cells also refer to T helper lymphocytes play a critical role in the immune system. Naïve CD4+ T cells differentiate into at least four subsets, T helper 1 (Th1), T helper 2 (Th2), T helper 17 (Th17), and T regulatory (Treg) cells. The master regulator controlling each subset have been defined as follows, Tbet (Th1), Gata3 (Th2), RORγt (Th17), FoxP3 (Treg). The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of WCT and dry-cupping therapy (DCT) on the ratios of Th1/Th2 and Treg /Th17 in healthy individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Persian medicine; Subsets of T lymphocyte; Wet Cupping Therapy
Year: 2020 PMID: 31921605 PMCID: PMC6941689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1Consort flow diagram of the trial
The primer sequences used in the real-time PCR
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| Forward | 5'-CACTAGGCGCTCACTGTTCTC-3' |
| Reverse | 5'-CCAATACGACCAAATCCGTTGAC-3' | |
|
| Forward | 5'-ATTGCCGTGACTGCCTACCAGA-3' |
| Reverse | 5'-GGAATTGACAGTTGGGTCCAGG-3' | |
|
| Forward | 5'-ACCACAACCACACTCTGGAGGA-3' |
| Reverse | 5'-TCGGTTTCTGGTCTGGATGCCT-3' | |
|
| Forward | 5'-GGCACAATGTCTCCTCCAGAGA-3' |
| Reverse | 5'-CAGATGAAGCCTTGGTCAGTGC-3' | |
|
| Forward | 5'-CCCTGACAGAGATAGAGCACC-3' |
| Reverse | 5'-TTCCCACATCTCCCACATGG-3' |
Clinical characteristics of each group
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| 32.90±6.28 | 33.80±6.4 |
|
| 175.19±5.61 | 177.05±6.19 |
|
| 79.24±10.92 | 81.17±12.04 |
|
| 25.82±3.4 | 25.84±3.22 |
*Standard deviation
The hemoglobin level in 3 different stages (mean±SD)
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCT | DCT | WCT | DCT | WCT | DCT | |
| 15.5±0.9 | 15.5±1 | 15.3±1.1 | 15.4±1 | 14.94±1 | 15.6±1 | |
*Standard deviation
The statistical details related to the GEE method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| WCT | - 0.703 | 0.4737 | 2.206 | 1 | 0.137 |
| Time | 0.003 | 0.0184 | 0.027 | 1 | 0.869 | |
| WCT*Time | 0.026 | 0.0257 | 1.058 | 1 | 0.304 | |
|
| WCT | - 0.975 | 0.5995 | 2.645 | 1 | 0.104 |
| Time | ˉ 0.038 | 0.173 | 4.843 | 1 | 0.028* | |
| WCT*Time | 0.068 | 0.0259 | 6.899 | 1 | 0.009* | |
|
| WCT | -1.103 | 0.4534 | 5.916 | 1 | 0.015* |
| Time | -0.037 | 0.0136 | 7.529 | 1 | 0.006* | |
| WCT*Time | 0.082 | 0.0196 | 17.680 | 1 | 0.00* | |
|
| WCT | -1.350 | 0.4480 | 9.084 | 1 | 0.003* |
| Time | -0.012 | 0.0203 | 0.357 | 1 | 0.550 | |
| WCT*Time | 0.061 | 0.0263 | 5.353 | 1 | 0.021* | |
|
| WCT | 0.219 | 3.3144 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.947 |
| Time | -0.010 | 1162 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.933 | |
| WCT*Time | 0.006 | 1678 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.971 | |
|
| WCT | -55.365 | 31.8656 | 3.019 | 1 | 0.082 |
| Time | -1.595 | 1.0378 | 2.363 | 1 | 0.124 | |
| WCT*Time | 3.341 | 1.6925 | 3.897 | 1 | 0.048* |
*p values that have been underlined and in bold show significant changes.
**Association of the analyzed parameter for each group for four weeks.
Figure 2The expression pattern of the T-bet (Th1) transcription factor gene (mean±SEM)
Figure 3The expression pattern of the GATA-3 (Th2) transcription factor gene (mean±SEM). p<0.05 WCT*Time
Figure 4The expression pattern of the RORγt (Th17) transcription factor gene (mean±SEM). p<0.01 WCT*Time
Figure 5The expression pattern of the Foxp-3 (Treg) transcription factor gene (mean±SEM). p<0.05 WCT*Time
Figure 6The gene expression ratio forT-bet/GATA-3 (Th1/Th2) (mean±SEM)
Figure 7The gene expression ratio for the Foxp-3/RORγt (Treg/Th17) (mean±SEM). p<0.05 WCT*Time