| Literature DB >> 31921568 |
Wei Chen1, Hao Chen1, Dandan Zheng1, Hongbo Zhang2,3, Lianfu Deng2, Wenguo Cui2, Yuhui Zhang1, Hélder A Santos4,5, Hongxing Shen1.
Abstract
Gene therapy provides an ideal potential treatment for intervertebral disk degeneration by delivering synthetic microRNAs (miRNAs) to regulate the gene expression levels. However, it is very challenging to deliver miRNAs directly, which leads to inactivation, low transfection efficiency, and short half-life. Here, Agomir is loaded in hydrogel to construct a gene-hydrogel microenvironment for regulating the synthesis/catabolism balance of the tissue extracellular matrix (ECM) to treat degenerative diseases. Agomir is a cholesterol-, methylation-, and phosphorothioate-modified miRNA, which can mimic the function of miRNA to regulate the expression of the target gene. Agomir874 that mimics miRNA874 is synthesized to down regulate the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in nucleus pulposus (NP). At the same time, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel is synthesized through Ag-S coordination of 4-arm PEG-SH and silver ion solution, which has injectable, self-healing, antimicrobial, degradable, and superabsorbent properties and matches perfectly with the mechanism of intervertebral disk. By delivering Agomir-loaded PEG-hydrogel to a degenerative intervertebral disk, a gene-hydrogel microenvironment is constructed in situ, which reduces the expression of MMPs, regulates the synthesis/catabolism balance of ECM in the NP of the intervertebral disk, and improves the tissue microenvironment regeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Agomir; extracellular matrix; gene therapy; gene‐hydrogel microenvironment; hydrogels
Year: 2019 PMID: 31921568 PMCID: PMC6947697 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Scheme 1Gene‐hydrogel microenvironment for regeneration of IVDD. a) The construction of gene‐hydrogel microenvironment. b) The Agomir@PEG was injected into the intervertebral space to construct the gene‐hydrogel microenvironment. c–e) The multi‐functions provided by the gene‐hydrogel microenvironment, matching the regeneration of IVDD.
Figure 1Properties of the PEG‐Ag hydrogels. a) The mixture of PEG‐thiol and AgNO3 solution. b) The process of self‐healing. c) Photograph of the injectable hydrogel. d) Strain sweep measurements of the storage moduli (G' denotes the elastic modulus and G” denotes the loss modulus). e) Measure of viscosity parameters in relation to time in seconds. The strain shearing rate alternated between 0.05% strain for 100 s and 500% strain for 50 s. f,g) Magnified SEM results (Agomir874 was marked by red circle). h) Swelling percentage. i) Degradation percentage.
Figure 2Biological study of hydrogels in vitro. a,b) Antibacterial sensitivity with agar diffusion test. c,d) Live/dead staining of human fibroblasts co‐cultured with PEG‐Ag hydrogel.
Figure 3The effects of Agomir874@PEG on regulating the synthesis/catabolism balance of NPCs in vitro. a) The volcano plot of differential expression of miRNAs in IVDD. Red circles denote miRNA874 under‐expressed in degenerative intervertebral disc. b) Polymerase chain reaction data of gene expression in NPCs treated with Agomir874 or Agomir874 NC. c) The diagram of the effects of gene‐hydrogel microenvironment on regulating the synthesis/catabolism balance. d) Western blotting data showing the levels of down‐regulating the expression of MMPs. Western blotting data of the levels of e) MMP‐1 and f) MMP‐2 and g) MMP‐13. h) Western blotting data showing the levels of up‐regulation of the expression of Col II and Sox‐9. Western blotting data of the levels of i) Col II and (j) Sox‐9.
Figure 4Single‐segment intervertebral biomechanical studies. a) The diagram of single‐segment intervertebral biomechanical studies. b) Compression curve of different treatment at single‐segment of intervertebral disk. c) The elastic modulus of the first 30% of the deformity rate. d) The schematic diagram of stress dispersion of gene‐hydrogel microenvironment.
Figure 5Imaging data of animal experiments. a) Acupuncture model of rat coccygeal vertebrae. b) The X‐ray images of rat coccygeal vertebrae. c) The intervertebral disc height (IDH) changes of different groups at different time points. d) The IDH changes of different groups at 1 week after surgery. e) The IDH changes of different groups at 4 weeks after surgery. f) The IDH changes of different groups at 8 weeks after surgery. g) The MRI images of rat coccygeal vertebrae. h) The gray scale changes of different groups at 8 weeks after surgery.
Figure 6Histological images of animal experiments. a) The H&E staining images of different groups at different time points. b) The Safranin O staining images of different groups at different time points. c) The histological grade of different groups at different time points. d) The histological grade of different groups at 4 weeks. e) The histological grade of different groups at 8 weeks.