| Literature DB >> 31921067 |
Yuxiao Chang1, Fengyi Hou2, Zhiyuan Pan1, Zongyu Huang1, Ni Han1, Lei Bin1, Huimin Deng1, Zhengchao Li1, Lei Ding3, Hong Gao3, Fachao Zhi2, Ruifu Yang1, Yujing Bi1.
Abstract
Most bacteria in the human gut are difficult to culture, and culturomics has been designed to overcome this issue. Culturomics makes it possible to obtain living bacteria for further experiments, unlike metagenomics. However, culturomics is work-intensive, which prevents its wide application. In this study, we performed a 30-day continuous enrichment in blood culture bottles and cultured bacterial isolates from pre-cultures removed at different time points. We compared the bacteria isolated from the enriched culture with or without adding fresh medium after each pre-culture was removed. We also compared "experienced" colony picking (i.e., picking two to three colonies for each recognized colony type) and picking all the colonies from each plate. In total, from five fecal samples, 106 species were isolated, including three novel species and six that have not previously been isolated from the human body. Adding fresh medium to the culture increased the rate of bacterial species isolation by 22% compared with the non-supplemented culture. Picking all colonies increased the rate of bacterial isolation by only 8.5% compared with experienced colony picking. After optimization through statistical analysis and simulation, sampling aerobic and anaerobic enrichment cultures at six and seven time-points, respectively, is likely to isolate >90% of bacterial species, reducing the workload by 40%. In conclusion, an extended enrichment step ensures isolation of different bacterial species at different time-points, while adding the same quantity of fresh medium after sampling, the experienced picking and the optimized time-points favor the chance of isolating more bacterial species with less work.Entities:
Keywords: colony picking; culturomics; gut microbiota; medium supplementation; optimization strategy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31921067 PMCID: PMC6927924 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Experimental flow chart. The experiment was divided into three steps. The first step is pre-incubation: 1 g of each stool sample was suspended in 10 ml of PBS and allowed to stand for 5 min, after which 0.5 ml of the suspension was added to blood culture bottles containing sheep’s blood and rumen fluid. The bottles were divided into two groups: the supplemented group (S) and non-supplemented group (NS). The supplemented group was then further divided into the aerobic supplemented group (O2S) and the anaerobic supplemented group (AS). Similarly, the non-supplemented group was divided into the aerobic non-supplemented group (O2) and the anaerobic non-supplemented group (A). The second step was subculturing and enrichment: samples were taken from the pre-cultures every 3 days and subcultured aerobically and anaerobically on solid YCFA media, and the pH of the pre-cultures was measured using a pH meter. When colonies appeared on the plates, individual colonies were picked and transferred to liquid culture enrichment medium (YCFA) in 24-well plates. The last step was bacterial storage and identification: the enrichment cultures were frozen in glycerol and inoculated to solid medium at the same time. Then, the colonies were tested by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Unidentified colonies were evaluated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All bacteria were incubated aerobically for 1 day or anaerobically for 3 days at 37°C.
FIGURE 2The bacteria identified from each of the fecal samples. The outermost circle shows all 106 of the bacteria that were identified, the five colors in the next circle represent the fecal samples that the bacteria were isolated from, and the innermost circle shows the proportion of bacterial species that were isolated from each of the five samples. The line in the middle connects the sample to the bacterial species that were isolated from that sample.
Characteristics of the three novel bacterial species.
| New species | Novel bacteria 1 | F1 | S | 93.15% | |
| Novel bacteria 2 | F4 | NS | 96.11% | ||
| Novel bacteria 3 | F4 | S | 97.37% |
Characteristics of eight bacterial species not previously isolated from the human intestine or body.
| Not previously isolated from the gut | F2 | NS | Blood from a patient with bacteremia | ||
| F1 and F3 | S and NS | Tropical ulcer tissue | |||
| Not previously isolated | F4 | NS | Warm spring | ||
| from the human body | F1 | NS | Puffer fish liver | ||
| F3 | S and NS | Cryogenic tubes used for collecting air samples from high altitudes | |||
| F4 | S and NS | Cow dung | |||
| F4 | S and NS | ||||
| F4 and F5 | S and NS | Chironomid egg mass |
FIGURE 3(A) Bacteria isolated only from the aerobic supplemented group, only from the aerobic non-supplemented group, and from both groups. (B) Bacteria isolated only from the anaerobic supplemented group, only from the anaerobic non-supplemented group, and from both groups. (C) Equation fitted to the number of bacterial species identified depending on the number of samples taken. (D) Bacteria isolated from fecal sample 4 over time. The bacteria identified at each time point are represented by horizontal lines of different colors. ∗indicates bacteria that were only isolated from the supplemented group, and #indicates bacteria that were only isolated from the non-supplemented group. The color scale at the bottom of the figure indicates the number of bacterial species isolated from the sample taken at each time point.
FIGURE 4(A) The number of bacterial species isolated varies with time under aerobic conditions. (B) The number of bacterial species isolated varies with time under anaerobic conditions. (C) The pH value of the pre-culture varies with time under aerobic conditions. (D) The pH value of the pre-cultures varies with time under anaerobic conditions. Results are shown as means ± SEM. (E) The effects of pH on the likelihood of isolating different bacteria, p < 0.05.
FIGURE 5(A) The proportion of bacteria missed in different groups at a single time point and over the entire time period. Results are shown as means ± SEM. (B) The number of bacteria not isolated from the sample taken at the previous time point compared with the number of bacteria isolated from the current sample. (C) The change in bacterial identification rate over time. (D) Equation fitted to the number of bacterial species depending on the workload before and after optimization of the method.
Bacterial isolation rate under aerobic conditions.
| 5 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘27’) | 80.90 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘12,’ ‘27’) | 79.23 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘9,’ ‘18,’ ‘27’) | 79.12 | |
| 6 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘27’) | 86.57 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘18,’ ‘27’) | 86.53 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘12,’ ‘27’) | 86.00 | |
| 7 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘27,’ ‘30’) | 91.35 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘12,’ ‘27,’ ‘30’) | 90.78 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘12,’ ‘15,’ ‘27’) | 90.48 |
Bacterial isolation rate under anaerobic conditions.
| 5 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘15,’ ‘27’) | 89.89 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘18,’ ‘27’) | 88.33 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘27’) | 88.15 | |
| 6 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘27’) | 92.63 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘15,’ ‘24,’ ‘27’) | 92.55 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘15,’ ‘18,’ ‘27’) | 92.07 | |
| 7 | (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘24,’ ‘27’) | 95.29 |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘18,’ ‘27’) | 94.81 | |
| (Day ‘0,’ ‘3,’ ‘6,’ ‘9,’ ‘15,’ ‘21,’ ‘27’) | 94.55 |