| Literature DB >> 31921011 |
Yiming Zhang1,2, Jian Zhou2, Zhenglin Dong1,2, Guanya Li1,2, Jingjing Wang2, Yikun Li2, Dan Wan2, Huansheng Yang1, Yulong Yin1,2.
Abstract
Copper is an essential microelement for animals, and not only it has been used as a feed additive at pharmacological doses in swine production to improve growth performance, but it also has an effect on intestinal microbes by enhancing host bacterial resistance. However, there are few reports on the effects of pharmacological doses of copper on intestinal microorganisms and the antimicrobial resistance profiles of pathogenic bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, in pigs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of pharmacological doses of copper on the microbial communities in the hindgut and the antimicrobial resistance profiles of E. coli in weaned piglets. Twenty-four healthy weaned piglets aged 21 ± 1 days and with an average weight of 7.27 ± 0.46 kg were randomly divided into four groups. The control group was fed a basal diet, while the treatment groups were fed a basal diet supplemented with 20, 100, or 200 mg copper/kg feed, in the form of CuSO4. Anal swabs were collected at 0, 21, and 42 days of the trial, and E. coli was isolated. Meanwhile, the contents of the ileum and cecum from the control and 200 mg copper/kg feed groups were collected at 21 and 42 days for microbial community analysis and E. coli isolation. All isolated E. coli strains were used for antimicrobial resistance profile analysis. A pharmacological dose of copper did not significantly change the diversity, but significantly affected the composition, of microbial communities in the ileum and cecum. Moreover, it affected the microbial metabolic functions of energy metabolism, protein metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis. Specifically, copper treatment increased the richness of E. coli in the hindgut and the rates of E. coli resistance to chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. Moreover, the rate of E. coli resistance to multiple drugs increased in the ileum of pigs fed a pharmacological dose of copper. Thus, a pharmacological dose of copper affected the composition of the microbial community, increased the antimicrobial resistance rates of intestinal E. coli, and was most likely harmful to the health of piglets at the early stage after weaning.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial resistance; copper; microbial community; piglet
Year: 2019 PMID: 31921011 PMCID: PMC6927916 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Formulation of basal diet (air-dry basis, %).
| Corn | 25 | Dry matter (%) | 87 |
| Extruded corn | 34 | Digestible energy (kcal/kg) | 3.40 |
| Soymeal | 2.5 | CP (%) | 20.00 |
| Fermented soymeal | 8 | Ash (%) | 7.84 |
| Extruded soybean | 5 | Ether extract (%) | 3.55 |
| Fish meal | 10 | NDF (%) | 22.16 |
| Whey powder | 4 | ADF (%) | 11.75 |
| Glucose | 5 | Ca (%) | 0.80 |
| 0.45 | Total P (%) | 0.45 | |
| 0.05 | Cu (control) | 5.09 mg/kg | |
| 0.2 | Cu (20 mg/kg) | 25.68 mg/kg | |
| 0.8 | Cu (100 mg/kg) | 81.80 mg/kg | |
| Soybean oil | 1.1 | Cu (200 mg/kg) | 176.58 mg/kg |
| Sodium chloride (≥91.0%) | 0.74 | ||
| Calcium carbonate | 0.4 | ||
| Calcium hydrophosphate | 0.28 | ||
| Antioxidant | 0.08 | ||
| Citric acid | 1.3 | ||
| Mildew preventive | 0.1 | ||
| Premixb | 1 |
The effect of Cu levels on the growth performance of piglets during the first 3 weeks and the second 3 weeks of feeding.
| ADG (kg) | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.154 | |
| 1–3 weeks | ADFI (g) | 405.58 ± 14.62 | 444.57 ± 21.58 | 0.157 |
| FCR | 1.86 ± 0.04 | 1.80 ± 0.09 | 0.559 | |
| ADG (kg) | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.201 | |
| 4–6 weeks | ADFI (g) | 787.41 ± 34.66 | 805.18 ± 40.89 | 0.743 |
| FCR | 2.12 ± 0.08 | 1.95 ± 0.09 | 0.177 |
FIGURE 1Principal coordinate analysis and unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPMGA) cluster analysis of microbial communities in the ileum and cecum of weaned piglets after 3 and 6 weeks of feeding. (A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities in the ileum, (B) UPMGA cluster analysis of microbial communities in the ileum, (C) PCoA of microbial communities in the cecum, and (D) UPMGA cluster analysis of microbial communities in the cecum. I, ileal microbiota; C, cecal microbiota; L, control group; H, Cu-supplemented group; 3w, 3 weeks of feeding after weaning; 6w, 6 weeks of feeding after weaning.
FIGURE 2Significantly different compositions of the ileal and cecal microbiota between control and Cu-supplemented groups determined by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size analysis after 3 and 6 weeks of feeding in weaned piglets. Significantly different compositions of the ileal (A) and cecal (B) microbiota after 3 weeks of feeding and significantly different compositions of the ileal (C) and cecal (D) microbiota after 6 weeks of feeding. I, ileal microbiota; C, cecal microbiota; L, control group; H, Cu-supplemented group; 3w, 3 weeks of feeding after weaning; 6w, 6 weeks of feeding after weaning.
FIGURE 3Analysis of functional differences in the ileal and cecal microbiota of piglets between control and Cu-supplemented groups after 6 weeks of feeding. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the functions of the ileal (A) and cecal (B) microbiota, significantly different functions of the ileal (C) and cecal (D) microbiota. IL, ileal microbiota in control group; IH, ileal microbiota in Cu-supplemented group; CL, cecal microbiota in control group; CH, cecal microbiota in Cu-supplemented group. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test only, due to the minor changes in these microbiome data.
Number of antimicrobial multiresistant E. coli isolates in ileum and cecum.
| 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 2 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 21 |
| 3 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 28 |
| ≥4 and ≤6 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 44 |
| >6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Antimicrobial resistance rates (95% CI) of Escherichia coli in ileum and cecum1.
| AMC | Control | 0.00 (0.00, 16.84) | 0.00 (0.00, 10.28) |
| High Cu | 6.67 (0.82, 22.07) | 5.71 (0.70, 19.16) | |
| 0.510 | 0.493 | ||
| CRO | Control | 10.00 (1.24, 31.70) | 11.76 (3.30, 27.45) |
| High Cu | 20.00 (7.71, 38.57) | 14.29 (4.81, 30.26) | |
| 0.450 | 1.000 | ||
| C | Control | 75.00 (50.90, 91.34) | 47.06 (29.78, 64.87) |
| High Cu | 80.00 (61.43, 92.29) | 74.29 (56.74, 87.51) | |
| 0.736 | 0.027 | ||
| CN | Control | 20.00 (5.73, 43.66) | 41.18 (24.65, 59.30) |
| High Cu | 20.00 (7.71, 38.57) | 28.57 (14.64, 46.30) | |
| 1.000 | 0.318 | ||
| CIP | Control | 15.00 (3.21, 37.89) | 35.29 (19.75, 53.51) |
| High Cu | 46.67 (28.34, 65.67) | 25.71 (12.49, 43.26) | |
| 0.032 | 0.440 | ||
| AMP | Control | 50.00 (27.20, 72.80) | 73.53 (55.64, 87.12) |
| High Cu | 73.33 (54.11, 87.72) | 71.43 (53.70, 85.36) | |
| 0.134 | 1.000 | ||
| ATM | Control | 0.00(0.00, 16.84) | 2.94 (0.07, 15.33) |
| High Cu | 13.33(3.76, 30.72) | 8.5 7(1.80, 23.06) | |
| 0.140 | 0.614 | ||
| MEM | Control | 0.00 (0.00, 16.84) | 2.94 (0.07, 15.33) |
| High Cu | 0.00 (0.00, 11.57) | 5.71 (0.70, 19.16) | |
| 1.000 | |||
| AK | Control | 0.00 (0.00, 16.84) | 5.88 (0.72, 19.68) |
| High Cu | 13.33 (3.76, 30.72) | 14.29 (4.81, 30.26) | |
| 0.140 | 0.428 | ||
| SXT | Control | 80.00 (56.34, 94.27) | 94.12 (80.32, 99.28) |
| High Cu | 80.00 (61.43, 92.29) | 91.43 (76.94, 98.20) | |
| 1.000 | 1.000 |
Antimicrobial resistance rates (95% CI) of Escherichia coli from anal swabs1.
| 0 | 53.33(26.59,78.73) | 46.67(21.27,73.41) | 53.33(26.59,78.73) | 38.89(17.30,64.25) | 0.812 | |
| C | 3 | 53.33(26.59,78.73) | 29.41(10.31,55.96) | 60.00(32.29,83.66) | 66.67(38.38,88.18) | 0.153 |
| 6 | 19.05(5.45,41.91)a | 23.81(8.22,47.17)a | 46.67(21.27,73.41)a | 78.26(56.30,92.54)b | 0.000 | |
| 0 | 29.41(10.31,55.96) | 11.11(1.38,34.71) | 40.00(16.34,67.71) | 50.00(26.02,73.98) | 0.063 | |
| CIP | 3 | 20.00(4.33,48.09) | 11.76(1.46,36.44) | 26.67(7.79,55.10) | 13.33(1.66,40.46) | 0.692 |
| 6 | 14.29(3.05,36.34)a | 4.76(0.12,23.82)a | 26.67(7.79,55.10)ab | 30.43(13.21,52.92)b | 0.046 | |