| Literature DB >> 31920494 |
Allen Chi-Shing Yu1,2, Aldrin Kay-Yuen Yim1,3, Anne Yin-Yan Chan4, Liz Y P Yuen5, Wing Chi Au4,6, Timothy H T Cheng5, Xiao Lin2, Jing-Woei Li1, Larry W L Chan7, Vincent C T Mok4,6, Ting-Fung Chan1,2,6, Ho Yin Edwin Chan1,2,6.
Abstract
Genetic testing for neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) is highly challenging because of genetic heterogeneity and overlapping manifestations. Targeted-gene panels (TGPs), coupled with next-generation sequencing (NGS), can facilitate the profiling of a large repertoire of ND-related genes. Due to the technical limitations inherent in NGS and TGPs, short tandem repeat (STR) variations are often ignored. However, STR expansions are known to cause such NDs as Huntington's disease and spinocerebellar ataxias type 3 (SCA3). Here, we studied the clinical utility of a custom-made TGP that targets 199 NDs and 311 ND-associated genes on 118 undiagnosed patients. At least one known or likely pathogenic variation was found in 54 patients; 27 patients demonstrated clinical profiles that matched the variants; and 16 patients whose original diagnosis were refined. A high concordance of variant calling were observed when comparing the results from TGP and whole-exome sequencing of four patients. Our in-house STR detection algorithm has reached a specificity of 0.88 and a sensitivity of 0.82 in our SCA3 cohort. This study also uncovered a trove of novel and recurrent variants that may enrich the repertoire of ND-related genetic markers. We propose that a combined comprehensive TGPs-bioinformatics pipeline can improve the clinical diagnosis of NDs.Entities:
Keywords: clinical decision support; gene panel; high-throughput sequencing; neurodegenerative diseases; short tandem repeat; undiagnosed diseases
Year: 2019 PMID: 31920494 PMCID: PMC6917647 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1Summary of the top 15 variants, clinical symptoms, and demographic profiles of the recruited patients. Columns represent patients and rows represent genes. The percentage of patients in our cohort having at least one missense, stop gain, frameshift indels, inframe indels, or splice site variation in each gene is shown on the left. Variants, clinical symptoms and demographic profiles are color-coded according to the legends within the figure.
List of pathogenic variants and related clinical findings.
| 1 | 0fd42 | 36–40 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.6:c.118G > T | Likely Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | no | CMTX1 |
| 2 | 7f225 | 26–30 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | no | CMTX1 |
| 3 | 5316c | 6–10 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | no | CMTX1 |
| 4 | 59e19 | 41–45 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | no | CMTX1 |
| 5 | 67067 | 31–35 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | no | CMTX1 |
| 6 | 44c80 | 11–15 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs of LL showed unelicited result | no | CMTX1 |
| 7 | b17ef | 36–40 | CMT | GJB1 | NM_000166.5:c.-103C > T | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | MRI brain SVD | CMTX1 |
| 8 | c8376 | 36–40 | AD PD | PSEN1 LRRK2 | NM_000021.4:c.781G > A NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C | Likely Pathogenic | amyloid PET scan positive | MRI brain SVD | EOAD |
| 9 | 1da51 | 46–50 | SPG | SPAST | NM_014946.3:c.1507C > T | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain thinning corpus callosum | SPG4 |
| 10 | 785f3 | 61–65 | ALS | TARDBP | NM_007375.3:c.892G > A | Likely Pathogenic | EMG showed neurogenic changes | MRI spine normal | ALS10 |
| 11 | 9400f | 6–10 | SPG SCA | SACS | NM_014363.5:c.[7504C > T;8132C > T] | Pathogenic | ncs showed demyelination | MRI brain cerebellar atrophy | ARSACS |
| 12 | 3d914 | 31–35 | SCA | SYNE1 | NM_182961.3:c.[20263C > T;8889delT] | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain cerebellar atrophy | SCAR8 |
| 13 | e3d6c | 46–50 | SCA | TTBK2 | NM_173500.3:c.1306 _1307delGA | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain cerebellar atrophy | SCA11 |
| 14 | e7f6c | 16–20 | SCA | TTBK2 | NM_173500.3:c.1329dupA | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain cerebellar atrophy | SCA11 |
| 15 | 4e074 | UNKNOWN | SCA | PRKCG | NM_002739.4:c.301C > T | Pathogenic | CT brain showed cerebellar atrophy | no | SCA14 |
| 16 | b1556 | 41–45 | ALS | TARDBP | NM_007375.3:c.892G > A | Pathogenic | no | MRI spine normal | ALS10 |
| 17 | f5ca3 | 41–45 | SPG | PSEN1 | NM_000021.3:c.811C > G | Pathogenic | no | no | AD type 3, with spastic paraparesis |
| 18 | 76a50 | 36–40 | SCA | LRRK2 POLG | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C NM_001126131.1:c.2890C > T | Pathogenic | no | no | SCA |
| 19 | d59ec | 61–65 | MND | LRRK2 GDF6 | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C NM_001001557.3: c.1271A > G | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8, Klippel-Feil syndrome 1 |
| 20 | 73475 | 51–55 | Leucoence phalopathy | LRRK2 | NM_198578.3:c.7153G > A | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8 |
| 21 | 031b4 | 56–60 | AD | LRRK2 | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8 |
| 22 | 3e1e9 | 61–65 | FTD Progressive Supranuclear Palsy | LRRK2 | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8 |
| 23 | 108c9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | LRRK2 | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8 |
| 24 | 69f59 | 36–40 | PD | LRRK2 | NM_198578.3:c.4883G > C | Pathogenic | no | no | Parkinson disease 8 |
| 25 | 482d9 | 66–70 | Mitochondrial disease | PQBP1 | NM_001032383.1:c.461_462del | Pathogenic | no | no | Renpenning syndrome 1 |
| 26 | ef2d1 | 61–65 | SCA | TGM6 | NM_198994.2:c.1550T > G | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain cerebellar atrophy | SCA35 |
| 27 | 7688b | 66–70 | AD | APOE | ApoE-ε4/ε4 | Pathogenic | no | MRI brain mild atrophy | LOAD |
STR expansion predictions on patients with SCA3.
| 2abac | SCA3 | SCA2 | 1.00E-04 | SCA3 | −2.00 |
| 3038b | SCA3 | SCA3 | 3.00E-04 | SCA3 | −2.59 |
| A001 | SCA3 | SCA6,HD | 1.00E-04 | NA | −0.86 |
| A032 | SCA3 | NA | NA | SCA3 | −2.55 |
| A039 | SCA3 | NA | NA | SCA3 | −1.28 |
| A097 | SCA3 | NA | NA | SCA3 | −1.88 |
| A115 | SCA3 | SCA2,SCA17 | 1.00E-04 | SCA3 | −3.50 |
| A140 | SCA3 | NA | NA | NA | −0.45 |
| B042 | SCA3 | SCA2,SCA17 | 2.00E-04 | SCA3 | −0.92 |
| B180 | SCA3 | SCA8 | 1.00E-04 | SCA3 | −2.47 |
| P126 | SCA3 | SCA17 | 1.00E-04 | SCA3 | −2.31 |
FIGURE 2Distribution of normalized read counts of the SCA3 loci. The read counts of the controls and the patients with SCA3 were compared using the Wald test (P = 1.47e-05, FDR = 4.42e-05).
FIGURE 3ROC analysis of the in-house SCA3 detection algorithm. The in-house Z-score method achieved an AUC of 0.928.